REVIEW
Unique Exams: Designing assessments for integrity and fairness
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Unique Exams: Designing assessments for integrity and fairness
read the original abstract
Educators have faced new challenges in effective course assessment during the recent, unprecedented shift to remote online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. In place of typical proctored, timed exams, instructors must now rethink their methodology for assessing course-level learning goals. Are exams appropriate---or even feasible---in this new online, open-internet learning environment? In this experience paper, we discuss the unique exams framework: our framework for upholding exam integrity and student privacy. In our Probability for Computer Scientists Course at an R1 University, we developed autogenerated, unique exams where each student had the same four problem skeletons with unique numeric variations per problem. Without changing the process of the traditional exam, unique exams provide a layer of security for both students and instructors about exam reliability for any classroom environment---in-person or online. In addition to sharing our experience designing unique exams, we also present a simple end-to-end tool and example question templates for different CS subjects that other instructors can adapt to their own courses.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.