Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On the accuracy of the ALMA flux calibration in the time domain and across spectral windows

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.02186 v1 pith:6JRF7BEA submitted 2020-10-05 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.EPastro-ph.SR

On the accuracy of the ALMA flux calibration in the time domain and across spectral windows

classification astro-ph.IM astro-ph.EPastro-ph.SR
keywords calibrationalmafluxaccuracyrelativearraybandscience
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

A diverse array of science goals require accurate flux calibration of observations with the Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter array (ALMA), however, this goal remains challenging due to the stochastic time-variability of the ``grid'' quasars ALMA uses for calibration. In this work, we use 343.5 GHz (Band 7) ALMA Atacama Compact Array observations of four bright and stable young stellar objects over 7 epochs to independently assess the accuracy of the ALMA flux calibration and to refine the relative calibration across epochs. The use of these four extra calibrators allow us to achieve an unprecedented relative ALMA calibration accuracy of $\sim 3\%$. On the other hand, when the observatory calibrator catalog is not up-to-date, the Band 7 data calibrated by the ALMA pipeline may have a flux calibration poorer than the nominal 10\%, which can be exacerbated by weather-related phase decorrelation when self-calibration of the science target is either not possible or not attempted. We also uncover a relative flux calibration uncertainty between spectral windows of 0.8\%, implying that measuring spectral indices within a single ALMA band is likely highly uncertain. We thus recommend various methods for science goals requiring high flux accuracy and robust calibration, in particular, the observation of additional calibrators combined with a relative calibration strategy, and observation of solar system objects for high absolute accuracy.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.