Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Learnability and Complexity of Quantum Samples

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.11983 v1 pith:3RSPEJC7 submitted 2020-10-22 quant-ph cs.CCcs.LG

classification quant-phcs.CCcs.LG
keywords quantumgenerativemodelssamplescomplexitydistributionlearnabilitylearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Given a quantum circuit, a quantum computer can sample the output distribution exponentially faster in the number of bits than classical computers. A similar exponential separation has yet to be established in generative models through quantum sample learning: given samples from an n-qubit computation, can we learn the underlying quantum distribution using models with training parameters that scale polynomial in n under a fixed training time? We study four kinds of generative models: Deep Boltzmann machine (DBM), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Autoregressive GAN, on learning quantum data set generated by deep random circuits. We demonstrate the leading performance of LSTM in learning quantum samples, and thus the autoregressive structure present in the underlying quantum distribution from random quantum circuits. Both numerical experiments and a theoretical proof in the case of the DBM show exponentially growing complexity of learning-agent parameters required for achieving a fixed accuracy as n increases. Finally, we establish a connection between learnability and the complexity of generative models by benchmarking learnability against different sets of samples drawn from probability distributions of variable degrees of complexities in their quantum and classical representations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Comparing Classical Simulation and Sample-Based Learning of Quantum Systems

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    For random MPS and Clifford+T circuits, increases in entanglement or T-count correlate with sharper loss minima and worse reconstruction under constrained neural capacity.

  2. Artificial intelligence for representing and characterizing quantum systems

    quant-ph 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    A review organizes AI-based quantum system characterization into ML, deep learning, and language model paradigms, covering property prediction and implicit state reconstruction.

Pith tools