Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Debiased-CAM to mitigate image perturbations with faithful visual explanations of machine learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.05567 v3 pith:YP6SNUOY submitted 2020-12-10 cs.CV cs.CYcs.HCcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.CYcs.HCcs.LG
keywords explanationsbiasexplanationimagesmodelpredictionsuserdebiased
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Model explanations such as saliency maps can improve user trust in AI by highlighting important features for a prediction. However, these become distorted and misleading when explaining predictions of images that are subject to systematic error (bias) by perturbations and corruptions. Furthermore, the distortions persist despite model fine-tuning on images biased by different factors (blur, color temperature, day/night). We present Debiased-CAM to recover explanation faithfulness across various bias types and levels by training a multi-input, multi-task model with auxiliary tasks for explanation and bias level predictions. In simulation studies, the approach not only enhanced prediction accuracy, but also generated highly faithful explanations about these predictions as if the images were unbiased. In user studies, debiased explanations improved user task performance, perceived truthfulness and perceived helpfulness. Debiased training can provide a versatile platform for robust performance and explanation faithfulness for a wide range of applications with data biases.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools