Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Cyclic orthogonal convolutions for long-range integration of features

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.06462 v1 pith:Y3NW32OB submitted 2020-12-11 cs.CV cs.LG

Cyclic orthogonal convolutions for long-range integration of features

classification cs.CV cs.LG
keywords cnnscyclenetfeaturesintegrationimagelayerslong-rangesmall
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

In Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) information flows across a small neighbourhood of each pixel of an image, preventing long-range integration of features before reaching deep layers in the network. We propose a novel architecture that allows flexible information flow between features $z$ and locations $(x,y)$ across the entire image with a small number of layers. This architecture uses a cycle of three orthogonal convolutions, not only in $(x,y)$ coordinates, but also in $(x,z)$ and $(y,z)$ coordinates. We stack a sequence of such cycles to obtain our deep network, named CycleNet. As this only requires a permutation of the axes of a standard convolution, its performance can be directly compared to a CNN. Our model obtains competitive results at image classification on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet datasets, when compared to CNNs of similar size. We hypothesise that long-range integration favours recognition of objects by shape rather than texture, and we show that CycleNet transfers better than CNNs to stylised images. On the Pathfinder challenge, where integration of distant features is crucial, CycleNet outperforms CNNs by a large margin. We also show that even when employing a small convolutional kernel, the size of receptive fields of CycleNet reaches its maximum after one cycle, while conventional CNNs require a large number of layers.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.