REVIEW 2 cited by
Results of the Photometric LSST Astronomical Time-series Classification Challenge (PLAsTiCC)
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Results of the Photometric LSST Astronomical Time-series Classification Challenge (PLAsTiCC)
read the original abstract
Next-generation surveys like the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) on the Vera C. Rubin Observatory will generate orders of magnitude more discoveries of transients and variable stars than previous surveys. To prepare for this data deluge, we developed the Photometric LSST Astronomical Time-series Classification Challenge (PLAsTiCC), a competition which aimed to catalyze the development of robust classifiers under LSST-like conditions of a non-representative training set for a large photometric test set of imbalanced classes. Over 1,000 teams participated in PLAsTiCC, which was hosted in the Kaggle data science competition platform between Sep 28, 2018 and Dec 17, 2018, ultimately identifying three winners in February 2019. Participants produced classifiers employing a diverse set of machine learning techniques including hybrid combinations and ensemble averages of a range of approaches, among them boosted decision trees, neural networks, and multi-layer perceptrons. The strong performance of the top three classifiers on Type Ia supernovae and kilonovae represent a major improvement over the current state-of-the-art within astronomy. This paper summarizes the most promising methods and evaluates their results in detail, highlighting future directions both for classifier development and simulation needs for a next generation PLAsTiCC data set.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Machine Learning Closure Audits for LSST Photometric Supernova Cosmology
Out-of-fold LightGBM recovers up to R²=0.982 of bias-corrected Hubble residual variance in LSST SN Ia mocks and R²=0.725 on DES 5YR, with consistent SHAP rankings, while redshift bins explain <1%.
-
How Low Can We Go? Minimum Spectroscopic Requirements For Supernova Subtype Classification
ABC-SN classifies ten supernova subtypes with no performance loss down to R_λ=50 and SNR=5, and only minimal loss at R_λ=25.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.