Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Adaptive Graph Diffusion Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.15024 v2 pith:UA25CK3K submitted 2020-12-30 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords graphagdnsdiffusiongnnsruntimecoefficientsdatasetdeep
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have received much attention in the graph deep learning domain. However, recent research empirically and theoretically shows that deep GNNs suffer from over-fitting and over-smoothing problems. The usual solutions either cannot solve extensive runtime of deep GNNs or restrict graph convolution in the same feature space. We propose the Adaptive Graph Diffusion Networks (AGDNs) which perform multi-layer generalized graph diffusion in different feature spaces with moderate complexity and runtime. Standard graph diffusion methods combine large and dense powers of the transition matrix with predefined weighting coefficients. Instead, AGDNs combine smaller multi-hop node representations with learnable and generalized weighting coefficients. We propose two scalable mechanisms of weighting coefficients to capture multi-hop information: Hop-wise Attention (HA) and Hop-wise Convolution (HC). We evaluate AGDNs on diverse, challenging Open Graph Benchmark (OGB) datasets with semi-supervised node classification and link prediction tasks. Until the date of submission (Aug 26, 2022), AGDNs achieve top-1 performance on the ogbn-arxiv, ogbn-proteins and ogbl-ddi datasets and top-3 performance on the ogbl-citation2 dataset. On the similar Tesla V100 GPU cards, AGDNs outperform Reversible GNNs (RevGNNs) with 13% complexity and 1% training runtime of RevGNNs on the ogbn-proteins dataset. AGDNs also achieve comparable performance to SEAL with 36% training and 0.2% inference runtime of SEAL on the ogbl-citation2 dataset.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Gate the Filter, Not the Message: Node-Channel Mixtures for Pre-Propagation GNNs

    cs.LG 2026-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    FilterMoE uses joint node-channel routing of Chebyshev filter experts through a 3D gating tensor in pre-propagation GNNs and outperforms baselines on nine of eleven benchmarks while ranking first on all three large-sc...

  2. Same Graph Cross-Task Transfer in GNNs: Protocols and Predictors

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Under a fixed leakage-free protocol, NC→LP transfer reliably helps on homophilic graphs while LP→NC helps mainly when LP is easy and NC is unsaturated; homophily and CoTask Score guide mechanism choice.

  3. Enhancing Graph Representations with Neighborhood-Contextualized Message-Passing

    cs.LG 2025-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    SINC-GCN adds an aggregated neighborhood-context term to pair-wise messages, yielding a simple GNN that outperforms classical one-hop GNNs on several node and graph benchmarks.

Pith tools