Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Implications of the Z_(cs)(3985) and Z_(cs)(4000) as two different states

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.08469 v2 pith:QKHJDYRP submitted 2021-04-17 hep-ph hep-exhep-latnucl-th

Implications of the $Z_{cs}(3985)$ and $Z_{cs}(4000)$ as two different states

classification hep-ph hep-exhep-latnucl-th
keywords statesdifferentstatebesiiiconsequencesflavorimplicationslhcb
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Recently, the hidden charm tetraquark states $Z_{cs}(3985)$ and $Z_{cs}(4000)$ with strangeness were observed by the BESIII and LHCb collaborations, respectively, which are great breakthroughs for exploring exotic QCD structures. The first and foremost question is whether they are the same state. In this work, we explore the implications of the narrower state $Z_{cs}(3985)$ in BESIII and the wider one $Z_{cs}(4000)$ in LHCb as two different states. Within a solvable nonrelativistic effective field theory, we include the possible violations of heavy quark spin symmetry and SU(3) flavor symmetry in a comprehensive approach. If $Z_{cs}(3985)$ and $Z_{cs}(4000)$ are two different states, our results show that $Z_{cs}(4000)/Z_{cs}(3985)$ is the pure $(|\bar{D}_s^*D\rangle+/- |\bar{D}_sD^*\rangle)/\sqrt{2}$ state, and the SU(3) flavor partner of $Z_{c}(3900)$ is $Z_{cs}(4000)$ rather than the $Z_{cs}(3985)$. Another two important consequences are the existence of a tensor $\bar{D}_s^*D^*$ resonance with mass about 4126 MeV and width 13 MeV, and the suppression of the decay mode $Z_{cs}(3985) \to J/\psi K$. The two consequences can be tested in experiments and distinguish the two-state interpretation from the one-state scheme.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.