pith. sign in

arxiv: 2105.13548 · v1 · pith:3QZZHFXWnew · submitted 2021-05-28 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Multi-Probe Modeling Strategy and Validation

E. Krause , X. Fang , S. Pandey , L. F. Secco , O. Alves , H. Huang , J. Blazek , J. Prat
show 116 more authors
This is my paper
classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords analysismodelingyeareffectssystematicsanalysesbaselinechoices
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This paper details the modeling pipeline and validates the baseline analysis choices of the DES Year 3 joint analysis of galaxy clustering and weak lensing (a so-called "3$\times$2pt" analysis). These analysis choices include the specific combination of cosmological probes, priors on cosmological and systematics parameters, model parameterizations for systematic effects and related approximations, and angular scales where the model assumptions are validated. We run a large number of simulated likelihood analyses using synthetic data vectors to test the robustness of our baseline analysis. We demonstrate that the DES Year 3 modeling pipeline, including the calibrated scale cuts, is sufficiently accurate relative to the constraining power of the DES Year 3 analyses. Our systematics mitigation strategy accounts for astrophysical systematics, such as galaxy bias, intrinsic alignments, source and lens magnification, baryonic effects, and source clustering, as well as for uncertainties in modeling the matter power spectrum, reduced shear, and estimator effects. We further demonstrate excellent agreement between two independently-developed modeling pipelines, and thus rule out any residual uncertainties due to the numerical implementation.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 9 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Inverting Fisher biases for fast systematics exploration

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Inverting Fisher biases enables quick checks on whether specific systematics explain cosmological tensions.

  2. First measurement of the Hubble constant from a combined weak lensing and gravitational-wave standard siren analysis

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Joint analysis of LVK standard sirens and DES 3x2pt data yields H0 = 67.9 +4.4/-4.3 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1} at 6.4% precision while tightening the Omega_m constraint by 22%.

  3. Assembly bias and the redshift evolution of intrinsic alignments for LRGs

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    FLAMINGO simulation analysis shows IA amplitude for LRGs depends on halo assembly history and exhibits redshift evolution beyond mass effects, yielding an empirical mass-redshift model.

  4. GalSBI: Forward Modelling Galaxy Clustering and Population

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GalSBI extended with optimal transport subhalo matching and SBI to forward-model galaxy population plus clustering, validated against DES Y3 and HSC data with public code release.

  5. Field-level weak lensing cosmology with $<100$ simulations using multifidelity simulation-based inference

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Multifidelity simulation-based inference enables accurate field-level weak lensing cosmology with 60-100 high-fidelity N-body simulations via pre-training on log-normal mocks.

  6. Modeling nonlinear scales for dynamical dark energy cosmologies with COLA

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    COLA-based hybrid emulator reproduces nonlinear power spectrum boosts in w0wa models to <2% error vs EuclidEmulator2 and produces <0.3σ shifts in LSST-like cosmic shear parameter constraints.

  7. Revisiting the 'Lensing is Low' Problem with UNIONS

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    New UNIONS galaxy-galaxy lensing data around CMASS galaxies indicates no significant lensing is low problem, with joint HOD fits to GGL and GC favoring a slightly lower matter power spectrum amplitude than Planck.

  8. Balancing bias, baryons, and scale cuts in LSST 3x2pt analysis

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A minimal bias model yields unbiased LambdaCDM constraints up to k_max=0.7 h/Mpc but biases neutrino mass estimates, while higher-order bias mimics baryonic suppression in LSST 3x2pt analyses using the new MGL pipeline.

  9. Quintom Model Perturbations

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A two-field quintom model reproduces w0waCDM perturbation features and is mildly favored over it in Bayesian fits to BAO, CMB, and SNIa data.