Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A comparison of latent semantic analysis and correspondence analysis of document-term matrices

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.06197 v4 pith:DKDGFLZQ submitted 2021-07-25 cs.IR cs.CLcs.LG

A comparison of latent semantic analysis and correspondence analysis of document-term matrices

classification cs.IR cs.CLcs.LG
keywords analysisauthorshipcomparisoncorrespondencedocument-termdocumentsdutchelements
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Latent semantic analysis (LSA) and correspondence analysis (CA) are two techniques that use a singular value decomposition (SVD) for dimensionality reduction. LSA has been extensively used to obtain low-dimensional representations that capture relationships among documents and terms. In this article, we present a theoretical analysis and comparison of the two techniques in the context of document-term matrices. We show that CA has some attractive properties as compared to LSA, for instance that effects of margins, i.e. sums of row elements and column elements, arising from differing document-lengths and term-frequencies are effectively eliminated, so that the CA solution is optimally suited to focus on relationships among documents and terms. A unifying framework is proposed that includes both CA and LSA as special cases. We empirically compare CA to various LSA based methods on text categorization in English and authorship attribution on historical Dutch texts, and find that CA performs significantly better. We also apply CA to a long-standing question regarding the authorship of the Dutch national anthem Wilhelmus and provide further support that it can be attributed to the author Datheen, amongst several contenders.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.