pith. sign in

arxiv: 2111.08065 · v1 · submitted 2021-11-15 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · gr-qc

The Bardeen-Petterson effect in accreting supermassive black-hole binaries: disc breaking and critical obliquity

Rebecca Nealon , Enrico Ragusa , Davide Gerosa , Giovanni Rosotti , Riccardo Barbieri This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 13:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE gr-qc
keywords Bardeen-Petterson effectsupermassive black hole binariesaccretion discdisc breakingwarped discspin alignmenthydrodynamical simulationsobliquity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Disc breaking at critical obliquity compromises black hole spin alignment in accreting binaries

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper links a semi-analytic model's predicted critical obliquity, where warp solutions cease, to the physical process of disc breaking in which the accretion disc splits into separate sections. Three-dimensional hydrodynamical simulations recover this correspondence and reveal additional cases of unsuccessful, single, or multiple breaks. Hydrodynamic features such as spiral arms can stabilize the disc and allow it to persist beyond the critical point. The central finding is that disc breaking hinders or prevents the viscous alignment of black-hole spins with the disc's orbital angular momentum during binary inspiral.

Core claim

The critical obliquity where solutions to the warp equations cease to exist marks the onset of disc breaking, and when breaking occurs the ability of the black holes and disc to align is compromised and in some cases prevented as the binary inspirals.

What carries the argument

Disc breaking, the disruption of the warped accretion disc into two or more discrete sections at the critical obliquity.

If this is right

  • Black-hole spins reach either full alignment or remain at the critical obliquity.
  • Discs exhibit unsuccessful, single, or multiple breaks depending on parameters.
  • Hydrodynamic effects such as spiral arms stabilize the disc against breaking beyond criticality.
  • Alignment between black holes and disc is compromised or prevented when breaking occurs during inspiral.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The richer breaking phenomenology may produce more varied final spin orientations than a simple alignment-or-critical-obliquity picture suggests.
  • Stabilization by spiral arms indicates that additional hydrodynamic physics can shift the effective boundary for breaking.
  • Multiple breaks could create radially disconnected disc regions whose separate evolutions affect the overall torque on the binary.

Load-bearing premise

The semi-analytic warp model accurately identifies the onset of disc breaking.

What would settle it

A 3D hydrodynamical simulation at parameters matching the critical obliquity that shows no disc disruption and continued alignment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2111.08065 by Davide Gerosa, Enrico Ragusa, Giovanni Rosotti, Rebecca Nealon, Riccardo Barbieri.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The different disc structure in a simulations with warping, unsuccessful breaking, successful breaking/tearing with one ring and successful breaking/tearing with multiple rings (left to right). The renderings in the top row show the x-y plane, with the BH oriented such that J = (sin θ, 0, cos θ). The second and third rows show the surface density Σ and the warp profile ψ. The simulations used here, from le… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Density renderings for a representative set of our suite of 143 simulations showing examples of warping, unsuccessful breaking and successful breaking. Common to all simulations are the spiral arms at the outer disc edge driven by the tidal interaction with the BH companion (shown in green). Top to bottom the view alternates between the x-y and the x-z plane. The colour scale shows column density in kg/m2 … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of our 3D hydrodynamical simulations to the 1D semi-analytic prediction by Gerosa et al. (2020) as a function of κ (Eq. 3) and the initial BH misalignment θ. Here the behaviour of the disc in our simulations is coded with warped discs as squares, unsuccessful breaking as pentagons, successful breaking into two discs with diamonds, and tearing into many rings as stars. The shaded regions indicate… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Location of the breaking radius measured in the sim￾ulations scaled by its predicted location, Eq. (6). We show our simulations with unsuccessful and successfully broken discs with κ = 2.6 × 10−1 . In the early stages of these simulations there appears to be a dependence on the inclination. Retrograde discs (stars) consistently break at larger radii than their prograde coun￾terparts (circles). of Eq. (6). … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparing the density evolution of a pro￾grade/retrograde pair of simulations after three companion orbits. While the 1D treatment implies perfect symmetry, in 3D simula￾tions this is broken by the spirals induced by the binary companion. The prediction of whether the disc will break or not remains ro￾bust, see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Location of signatures of tearing for simulations with the same BH and binary torque but different viscosities. Here the simulation with α = 0.05 has κ = 1.4 × 10−4 and α = 0.2 has κ = 2.2 × 105 . Although only the lower α disc successfully tears, both show indications of tearing at the same radius, simultaneously confirming the predictions by Martin et al. (2009) and Gerosa et al. (2020). and one would an… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Surface density (Σ, top panel) and warp profiles (ψ, bottom panel) for discs with θ = 40◦, κ = 1.4 × 10−4 (‘Strong spirals’, purple) and θ = 40◦, 4.3 × 10−5 (‘Weak spirals’, green). Solid (dashed) lines are computed at t = 4 orbits (t = 10 orbits) of the closer companion. The spirals are located at R ∼ 180Rg. Disc breaking is more successful in the case where the spirals are weaker as shown by the greater … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Breaking can be prevented by local hydrodynamical structures, like the spirals driven by the interaction with the binary companion. Upper and lower panel show a mass rendering of the simulations with θ = 40◦ and κ = 1.4 × 10−4 , 4.3 × 10−5 , respectively, at the same timestep of the dotted lines in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The inspiral of supermassive black-hole binaries in gas-rich environment is driven by the presence of an accretion disc and viscous interactions tend to align the spin of the black holes with the orbital angular momentum of the disc. Recent work introduced a new iterative approach to describe the alignment process and the resulting non-linear evolution of the surrounding warped accretion disc. Their model predicted that black-hole spins reach either full alignment or a critical obliquity where solutions to the warp equations cease to exist. In this paper, we show that this critical region corresponds to the disc breaking phenomenon, where the disc is disrupted into two or more discrete sections. We use 3D hydrodynamical simulations to (i) recover the predictions of the semi-analytic model and (ii) unveil a richer phenomenology where the disc exhibits either unsuccessful, single and multiple breaks. We additionally identify hydrodynamic effects such as spiral arms that are able to stabilise the disc against breaking beyond criticality. Our results show that when disc breaking occurs, the ability of black holes and disc to align is compromised and in some cases even prevented as the binary inspirals.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the connection between the critical obliquity predicted by a semi-analytic warp model for the Bardeen-Petterson alignment of accreting supermassive black-hole binaries and the phenomenon of disc breaking. 3D hydrodynamical simulations at fixed binary separation are used to recover the model's predictions and to identify richer behavior, including single and multiple breaks as well as stabilization by spiral arms. The authors conclude that when breaking occurs the ability of the black holes and disc to align is compromised or prevented as the binary inspirals.

Significance. If the mapping holds, the work provides a concrete numerical validation of the semi-analytic critical-obliquity threshold and introduces new hydrodynamic phenomenology (spiral-arm stabilization) that extends the model. This has direct implications for spin evolution during gas-driven inspirals and therefore for predictions of black-hole spin distributions and gravitational-wave signals from such systems. The explicit use of independent hydrodynamical runs to test the semi-analytic threshold is a methodological strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §5] Abstract and §5 (Conclusions): the strongest claim—that disc breaking compromises or prevents alignment 'as the binary inspirals'—rests on extrapolation from fixed-separation simulations via the semi-analytic warp model. The hydrodynamical runs do not evolve orbital separation or feed the broken-disc torque back into the binary orbit, so the inspiral inference is not directly demonstrated.
  2. [§4] §4 (Hydrodynamical methods): no resolution studies, convergence tests, or quantitative error analysis are reported for the 3D simulations. Because the central mapping between critical obliquity and the onset of breaking (single/multiple breaks, spiral-arm stabilization) is established by these runs, the absence of such checks leaves the robustness of the reported phenomenology only partially supported.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures and §3–§4] Figure captions and §3–§4: the distinction between the semi-analytic critical-obliquity locus and the simulation outcomes could be made more explicit to avoid reader confusion about which quantities are predicted versus measured.
  2. [Notation throughout] Notation: ensure that the symbol for obliquity (and any warp-radius definition) is used identically in the semi-analytic equations and in the simulation analysis sections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive report and positive assessment of the work's significance. We address the two major comments below, agreeing where the points are valid and outlining revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §5] Abstract and §5 (Conclusions): the strongest claim—that disc breaking compromises or prevents alignment 'as the binary inspirals'—rests on extrapolation from fixed-separation simulations via the semi-analytic warp model. The hydrodynamical runs do not evolve orbital separation or feed the broken-disc torque back into the binary orbit, so the inspiral inference is not directly demonstrated.

    Authors: We agree that the inference about alignment during inspiral is an extrapolation, as the hydrodynamical simulations are performed at fixed binary separation and do not include orbital evolution or torque feedback on the binary. The semi-analytic model supplies the link between the fixed-separation breaking threshold and the evolving system. We will revise the abstract and §5 to state this connection more explicitly, note the limitations of the fixed-separation approach, and avoid implying direct demonstration of the inspiral phase. The core result—that breaking occurs at the predicted critical obliquity—remains unchanged. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Hydrodynamical methods): no resolution studies, convergence tests, or quantitative error analysis are reported for the 3D simulations. Because the central mapping between critical obliquity and the onset of breaking (single/multiple breaks, spiral-arm stabilization) is established by these runs, the absence of such checks leaves the robustness of the reported phenomenology only partially supported.

    Authors: We acknowledge that explicit resolution studies, convergence tests, and quantitative error analysis were not reported in §4. The chosen resolutions follow those validated in prior work with the same code on warped discs, and the breaking phenomenology was robust across the parameter space explored. To address the comment, we will add a new subsection or appendix presenting resolution comparisons (e.g., doubling the grid resolution for representative obliquities) and basic error estimates on key diagnostics such as warp amplitude and break radius. This will be included in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor self-citation to prior semi-analytic warp model; 3D hydro simulations provide independent validation of breaking

full rationale

The paper cites 'recent work' for the iterative semi-analytic alignment model and critical-obliquity threshold, then performs fixed-separation 3D hydro runs to recover breaking, single/multiple breaks, and spiral-arm stabilization. These hydro results are generated independently of the semi-analytic equations and serve as external validation rather than a re-derivation. The claim that breaking compromises alignment 'as the binary inspirals' relies on extrapolation from the cited model, but this does not reduce any derivation in the present paper to its own inputs by construction. No fitted parameters are renamed as predictions, no ansatz is smuggled, and no uniqueness theorem is invoked from overlapping authors in a load-bearing way. The central results (phenomenology of breaking) stand on the simulations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on standard thin-disc assumptions and the validity of the prior semi-analytic warp model; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The semi-analytic warp equations remain valid up to the critical obliquity where solutions cease to exist.
    The mapping of this critical region to disc breaking is the central link being tested.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5745 in / 1073 out tokens · 20915 ms · 2026-05-24T13:18:12.670215+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A low viscosity relatively thick twisted disk in a supermassive binary black hole as a potential model of OJ 287

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A relatively thick low-viscosity twisted disk can explain the two orbit crossings per period observed in OJ 287 if secondary-disk collisions provide extra heating.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 28 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Amaro-Seoane P., et al., 2017, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017arXiv170200786A ( @eprint arXiv 1702.00786 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  2. [2]

    H., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/173679 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...421..651A 421, 651

    Artymowicz P., Lubow S. H., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/173679 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...421..651A 421, 651

    work page doi:10.1086/173679 1994

  3. [3]

    M., Petterson J

    Bardeen J. M., Petterson J. A., 1975, @doi [ ] 10.1086/181711 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1975ApJ...195L..65B 195, L65

    work page doi:10.1086/181711 1975

  4. [4]

    Berti E., Volonteri M., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/590379 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...684..822B 684, 822 ( @eprint arXiv 0802.0025 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/590379 2008

  5. [5]

    Alignment of the spins of supermassive black holes prior to coalescence

    Bogdanovi \'c T., Reynolds C. S., Miller M. C., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/518769 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...661L.147B 661, L147 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/0703054 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/518769 2007

  6. [6]

    Disc formation from tidal disruptions of stars on eccentric orbits by Schwarzschild black holes

    Bonnerot C., Rossi E. M., Lodato G., Price D. J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2411 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.455.2253B 455, 2253 ( @eprint arXiv 1501.04635 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2411 2016

  7. [7]

    Bregman M., Alexander T., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/748/1/63 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...748...63B 748, 63 ( @eprint arXiv 1109.5384 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/748/1/63 2012

  8. [8]

    Bardeen-Petterson effect and the disk structure of the Seyfert galaxy NGC 1068

    Caproni A., Abraham Z., Mosquera Cuesta H. J., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498684 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...638..120C 638, 120 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/0510276 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/498684 2006

  9. [9]

    Mignone and Jonathan C

    Caproni A., Abraham Z., Livio M., Mosquera Cuesta H. J., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11918.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.379..135C 379, 135 ( @eprint arXiv 0705.4035 )

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11918.x 2007

  10. [10]

    Dotti M., Volonteri M., Perego A., Colpi M., Ruszkowski M., Haardt F., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15922.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.402..682D 402, 682 ( @eprint arXiv 0910.5729 )

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15922.x 2010

  11. [11]

    J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1239 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495.1148D 495, 1148 ( @eprint arXiv 2005.00548 )

    Do g an S., Nixon C. J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1239 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495.1148D 495, 1148 ( @eprint arXiv 2005.00548 )

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1239 2020

  12. [12]

    Tearing up a misaligned accretion disc with a binary companion

    Do g an S., Nixon C., King A., Price D. J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv347 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449.1251D 449, 1251 ( @eprint arXiv 1502.05410 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stv347 2015

  13. [13]

    Instability of warped discs

    Do g an S., Nixon C. J., King A. R., Pringle J. E., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty155 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476.1519D 476, 1519 ( @eprint arXiv 1801.05426 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/sty155 2018

  14. [14]

    S., 2020, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020arXiv200812381D ( @eprint arXiv 2008.12381 )

    Dyda S., Reynolds C. S., 2020, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020arXiv200812381D ( @eprint arXiv 2008.12381 )

    work page arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    Precessing jets and X-ray bubbles from NGC1275 (3C84) in the Perseus galaxy cluster: a view from 3D numerical simulations

    Falceta-Gon c alves D., Caproni A., Abraham Z., Teixeira D. M., de Gouveia Dal Pino E. M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/713/1/L74 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...713L..74F 713, L74 ( @eprint arXiv 1003.2406 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/2041-8205/713/1/l74 2010

  16. [16]

    Bardeen-Petterson Effect and Quasi-Periodic Oscillations in X-Ray Binaries

    Fragile P. C., Mathews G. J., Wilson J. R., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/320990 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...553..955F 553, 955 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/0007478 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/320990 2001

  17. [17]

    J., 2002, Accretion Power in Astrophysics

    Frank J., King A., Raine D. J., 2002, Accretion Power in Astrophysics . Cambridge University Press

    work page 2002

  18. [18]

    Gerosa D., Veronesi B., Lodato G., Rosotti G., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1214 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.451.3941G 451, 3941 ( @eprint arXiv 1503.06807 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1214 2015

  19. [19]

    Gerosa D., Rosotti G., Barbieri R., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1693 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.496.3060G 496, 3060 ( @eprint arXiv 2004.02894 )

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1693 2020

  20. [20]

    Haiman Z., Kocsis B., Menou K., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1952 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...700.1952H 700, 1952 ( @eprint arXiv 0904.1383 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/700/2/1952 2009

  21. [21]

    B., Illarionov A

    Ivanov P. B., Illarionov A. F., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/285.2.394 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997MNRAS.285..394I 285, 394

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/285.2.394 1997

  22. [22]

    E., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/213.3.435 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985MNRAS.213..435K 213, 435

    Kumar S., Pringle J. E., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/213.3.435 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985MNRAS.213..435K 213, 435

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/213.3.435 1985

  23. [23]

    Lai D., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/307850 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...524.1030L 524, 1030 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/9904110 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/307850 1999

  24. [24]

    Lei W.-H., Zhang B., Gao H., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/98 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...762...98L 762, 98 ( @eprint arXiv 1202.4231 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/762/2/98 2013

  25. [25]

    Lense J., Thirring H., 1918, Physikalische Zeitschrift, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1918PhyZ...19..156L 19, 156

    work page 1918

  26. [26]

    B., Van Moer M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa099 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.507..983L 507, 983 ( @eprint arXiv 1904.08428 )

    Liska M., Hesp C., Tchekhovskoy A., Ingram A., van der Klis M., Markoff S. B., Van Moer M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa099 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.507..983L 507, 983 ( @eprint arXiv 1904.08428 )

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa099 2021

  27. [27]

    Lodato G., Gerosa D., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/sls018 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.429L..30L 429, L30 ( @eprint arXiv 1211.0284 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sls018 2013

  28. [28]

    J., Reeves J

    Lodato G., Price D. J., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16526.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.405.1212L 405, 1212 ( @eprint arXiv 1002.2973 )

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16526.x 2010

  29. [29]

    On the tilting of protostellar disks by resonant tidal effects

    Lubow S. H., Ogilvie G. I., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309101 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...538..326L 538, 326 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/0003028 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/309101 2000

  30. [30]

    and LeBlanc , F

    Lubow S. H., Ogilvie G. I., Pringle J. E., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05949.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002MNRAS.337..706L 337, 706 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/0208206 )

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05949.x 2002

  31. [31]

    and LeBlanc , F

    Maccarone T. J., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05876.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002MNRAS.336.1371M 336, 1371 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/0209105 )

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05876.x 2002

  32. [32]

    Mignone and Jonathan C

    Martin R. G., Pringle J. E., Tout C. A., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12349.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.381.1617M 381, 1617 ( @eprint arXiv 0708.2034 )

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12349.x 2007

  33. [33]

    Tavecchio and G

    Martin R. G., Reis R. C., Pringle J. E., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00545.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.391L..15M 391, L15 ( @eprint arXiv 0808.2139 )

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00545.x 2008

  34. [34]

    R., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15167.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.398..607V 398, 607

    Martin R. G., Pringle J. E., Tout C. A., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15465.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.400..383M 400, 383 ( @eprint arXiv 0907.5142 )

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15465.x 2009

  35. [35]

    Alignment of supermassive black hole binary orbits and spins

    Miller M. C., Krolik J. H., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/43 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...774...43M 774, 43 ( @eprint arXiv 1307.6569 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/774/1/43 2013

  36. [36]

    SPH simulations of tidally unstable accretion disks in cataclysmic variables

    Murray J. R., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/279.2.402 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996MNRAS.279..402M 279, 402 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/9511031 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/279.2.402 1996

  37. [37]

    The alignment of disk and black hole spins in active galactic nuclei

    Natarajan P., Pringle J. E., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/311658 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...506L..97N 506, L97 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/9808187 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/311658 1998

  38. [38]

    On the Bardeen-Petterson Effect in black hole accretion discs

    Nealon R., Price D. J., Nixon C. J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv014 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.448.1526N 448, 1526 ( @eprint arXiv 1501.01687 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stv014 2015

  39. [39]

    Warping a protoplanetary disc with a planet on an inclined orbit

    Nealon R., Dipierro G., Alexander R., Martin R. G., Nixon C., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2267 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481...20N 481, 20 ( @eprint arXiv 1808.05693 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2267 2018

  40. [40]

    C., et al., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03904.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.318L..65F 318, L65

    Nelson R. P., Papaloizou J. C. B., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03478.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.315..570N 315, 570 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/0001439 )

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03478.x 2000

  41. [41]

    Nixon C., King A., Price D., Frank J., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/757/2/L24 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...757L..24N 757, L24 ( @eprint arXiv 1209.1393 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/2041-8205/757/2/l24 2012

  42. [42]

    Nixon C., King A., Price D., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1136 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.434.1946N 434, 1946 ( @eprint arXiv 1307.0010 )

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1136 2013

  43. [43]

    T., Done C., Smith D

    Ogilvie G. I., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02340.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999MNRAS.304..557O 304, 557 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/9812073 )

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02340.x 1999

  44. [44]

    Local and global dynamics of warped astrophysical discs

    Ogilvie G. I., Latter H. N., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt916 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.433.2403O 433, 2403 ( @eprint arXiv 1303.0263 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stt916 2013

  45. [45]

    Papaloizou J. C. B., Pringle J. E., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/202.4.1181 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983MNRAS.202.1181P 202, 1181

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/202.4.1181 1983

  46. [46]

    SPLASH: An interactive visualisation tool for Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics simulations

    Price D. J., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1071/AS07022 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007PASA...24..159P 24, 159 ( @eprint arXiv 0709.0832 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1071/as07022 2007

  47. [47]

    Phantom: A smoothed particle hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics code for astrophysics

    Price D. J., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2018.25 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASA...35...31P 35, e031 ( @eprint arXiv 1702.03930 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1017/pasa.2018.25 2018

  48. [48]

    , keywords =

    Pringle J. E., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.aa.19.090181.001033 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981ARA&A..19..137P 19, 137

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.19.090181.001033 1981

  49. [49]

    E., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/281.1.357 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996MNRAS.281..357P 281, 357

    Pringle J. E., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/281.1.357 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996MNRAS.281..357P 281, 357

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/281.1.357 1996

  50. [50]

    J., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abdc25 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...909...82R 909, 82 ( @eprint arXiv 2101.05825 )

    Raj A., Nixon C. J., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abdc25 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...909...82R 909, 82 ( @eprint arXiv 2101.05825 )

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abdc25 2021

  51. [51]

    J., 1976, in Eggleton P., Mitton S., Whelan J., eds, Vol

    Rees M. J., 1976, in Eggleton P., Mitton S., Whelan J., eds, Vol. 73, Structure and Evolution of Close Binary Systems. p. 225

    work page 1976

  52. [52]

    , keywords =

    Sayeb M., Blecha L., Kelley L. Z., Gerosa D., Kesden M., Thomas J., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3826 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501.2531S 501, 2531 ( @eprint arXiv 2006.06647 )

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3826 2021

  53. [53]

    Scheuer P. A. G., Feiler R., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/282.1.291 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996MNRAS.282..291S 282, 291

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/282.1.291 1996

  54. [54]

    Linking the spin evolution of massive black holes to galaxy kinematics

    Sesana A., Barausse E., Dotti M., Rossi E. M., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/104 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...794..104S 794, 104 ( @eprint arXiv 1402.7088 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/794/2/104 2014

  55. [55]

    I., Sunyaev R

    Shakura N. I., Sunyaev R. A., 1973, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973A&A....24..337S 500, 33

    work page 1973

  56. [56]

    , keywords =

    Siwek M. S., Kelley L. Z., Hernquist L., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2361 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.498..537S 498, 537 ( @eprint arXiv 2005.09010 )

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2361 2020

  57. [57]

    Dynamics of warped accretion discs

    Tremaine S., Davis S. W., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu663 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.441.1408T 441, 1408 ( @eprint arXiv 1308.1964 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stu663 2014

  58. [58]

    Tremaine S., Touma J., Namouni F., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/137/3/3706 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009AJ....137.3706T 137, 3706 ( @eprint arXiv 0809.0237 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-6256/137/3/3706 2009

  59. [59]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

    work page

  60. [60]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

    work page