REVIEW 2 cited by
A Unified Framework for Rank-based Evaluation Metrics for Link Prediction in Knowledge Graphs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A Unified Framework for Rank-based Evaluation Metrics for Link Prediction in Knowledge Graphs
read the original abstract
The link prediction task on knowledge graphs without explicit negative triples in the training data motivates the usage of rank-based metrics. Here, we review existing rank-based metrics and propose desiderata for improved metrics to address lack of interpretability and comparability of existing metrics to datasets of different sizes and properties. We introduce a simple theoretical framework for rank-based metrics upon which we investigate two avenues for improvements to existing metrics via alternative aggregation functions and concepts from probability theory. We finally propose several new rank-based metrics that are more easily interpreted and compared accompanied by a demonstration of their usage in a benchmarking of knowledge graph embedding models.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Generalized Rank-based Evaluation for Knowledge Graph Completion: Perspectives, Framework, and Analyses
PROBE is a generalized rank-based KGC evaluation framework with adjustable sharpness and bias-robustness components that satisfies six claimed key properties where prior metrics fall short.
-
TRIAGE: Trustworthy Retrieval Instrumentation And Graph Evaluation
TRIAGE instruments Graph-RAG with gold-free stage metrics and a usage-time diagnostic chain that localizes failures to extraction, graph/schema, or retrieval levers.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.