pith. sign in

arxiv: 2204.10024 · v1 · pith:OM7C5GBCnew · submitted 2022-04-21 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.LG

Understanding the Domain Gap in LiDAR Object Detection Networks

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.LG
keywords domaingapstraininginferencelidarnetworksobjectopen-world
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In order to make autonomous driving a reality, artificial neural networks have to work reliably in the open-world. However, the open-world is vast and continuously changing, so it is not technically feasible to collect and annotate training datasets which accurately represent this domain. Therefore, there are always domain gaps between training datasets and the open-world which must be understood. In this work, we investigate the domain gaps between high-resolution and low-resolution LiDAR sensors in object detection networks. Using a unique dataset, which enables us to study sensor resolution domain gaps independent of other effects, we show two distinct domain gaps - an inference domain gap and a training domain gap. The inference domain gap is characterised by a strong dependence on the number of LiDAR points per object, while the training gap shows no such dependence. These fndings show that different approaches are required to close these inference and training domain gaps.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. RESOLVE: A Multi-Resolution and Multi-Modal Dataset for Roadside Cooperative Perception

    cs.CV 2026-06 accept novelty 7.0

    RESOLVE provides a controlled multi-resolution LiDAR and camera benchmark for evaluating 3D detection and tracking under point sparsity variations in roadside cooperative perception.