pith. sign in

arxiv: 2208.12266 · v2 · pith:KYFLGX2Wnew · submitted 2022-08-25 · 📡 eess.AS · cs.AI· cs.LG· q-bio.NC

Decoding speech perception from non-invasive brain recordings

classification 📡 eess.AS cs.AIcs.LGq-bio.NC
keywords speechbrainrecordingsdecodingnon-invasivedecodemodelparticipants
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Decoding speech from brain activity is a long-awaited goal in both healthcare and neuroscience. Invasive devices have recently led to major milestones in that regard: deep learning algorithms trained on intracranial recordings now start to decode elementary linguistic features (e.g. letters, words, spectrograms). However, extending this approach to natural speech and non-invasive brain recordings remains a major challenge. Here, we introduce a model trained with contrastive-learning to decode self-supervised representations of perceived speech from the non-invasive recordings of a large cohort of healthy individuals. To evaluate this approach, we curate and integrate four public datasets, encompassing 175 volunteers recorded with magneto- or electro-encephalography (M/EEG), while they listened to short stories and isolated sentences. The results show that our model can identify, from 3 seconds of MEG signals, the corresponding speech segment with up to 41% accuracy out of more than 1,000 distinct possibilities on average across participants, and more than 80% in the very best participants - a performance that allows the decoding of words and phrases absent from the training set. The comparison of our model to a variety of baselines highlights the importance of (i) a contrastive objective, (ii) pretrained representations of speech and (iii) a common convolutional architecture simultaneously trained across multiple participants. Finally, the analysis of the decoder's predictions suggests that they primarily depend on lexical and contextual semantic representations. Overall, this effective decoding of perceived speech from non-invasive recordings delineates a promising path to decode language from brain activity, without putting patients at risk for brain surgery.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Can neurons speak? Semantic narration of vision at single-cell resolution

    q-bio.NC 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    NEURRATOR bridges neural spike trains to frozen CLIP patch embeddings via a learned encoder, then uses a multimodal LM and sparse autoencoder to produce validated natural-language narrations of viewed scenes from Neur...

  2. NeuralBench: A Unifying Framework to Benchmark NeuroAI Models

    cs.LG 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    NeuralBench is a new benchmarking framework for neuroAI models on EEG data that finds foundation models only marginally outperform task-specific ones while many tasks like cognitive decoding stay highly challenging.