Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Forgetful Active Learning with Switch Events: Efficient Sampling for Out-of-Distribution Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.05106 v1 pith:PF773JN4 submitted 2023-01-12 cs.LG cs.CV

Forgetful Active Learning with Switch Events: Efficient Sampling for Out-of-Distribution Data

classification cs.LG cs.CV
keywords datalearningactiveout-of-distributionrepresentationsamplestrainingdirectly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper considers deep out-of-distribution active learning. In practice, fully trained neural networks interact randomly with out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs and map aberrant samples randomly within the model representation space. Since data representations are direct manifestations of the training distribution, the data selection process plays a crucial role in outlier robustness. For paradigms such as active learning, this is especially challenging since protocols must not only improve performance on the training distribution most effectively but further render a robust representation space. However, existing strategies directly base the data selection on the data representation of the unlabeled data which is random for OOD samples by definition. For this purpose, we introduce forgetful active learning with switch events (FALSE) - a novel active learning protocol for out-of-distribution active learning. Instead of defining sample importance on the data representation directly, we formulate "informativeness" with learning difficulty during training. Specifically, we approximate how often the network "forgets" unlabeled samples and query the most "forgotten" samples for annotation. We report up to 4.5\% accuracy improvements in over 270 experiments, including four commonly used protocols, two OOD benchmarks, one in-distribution benchmark, and three different architectures.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.