Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Convergence of First-Order Algorithms for Meta-Learning with Moreau Envelopes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.06806 v1 pith:A362KH32 submitted 2023-01-17 math.OC cs.LG

Convergence of First-Order Algorithms for Meta-Learning with Moreau Envelopes

classification math.OC cs.LG
keywords meta-learningmoreauconvergenceenvelopesfirst-orderfo-mamltheoryalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, we consider the problem of minimizing the sum of Moreau envelopes of given functions, which has previously appeared in the context of meta-learning and personalized federated learning. In contrast to the existing theory that requires running subsolvers until a certain precision is reached, we only assume that a finite number of gradient steps is taken at each iteration. As a special case, our theory allows us to show the convergence of First-Order Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (FO-MAML) to the vicinity of a solution of Moreau objective. We also study a more general family of first-order algorithms that can be viewed as a generalization of FO-MAML. Our main theoretical achievement is a theoretical improvement upon the inexact SGD framework. In particular, our perturbed-iterate analysis allows for tighter guarantees that improve the dependency on the problem's conditioning. In contrast to the related work on meta-learning, ours does not require any assumptions on the Hessian smoothness, and can leverage smoothness and convexity of the reformulation based on Moreau envelopes. Furthermore, to fill the gaps in the comparison of FO-MAML to the Implicit MAML (iMAML), we show that the objective of iMAML is neither smooth nor convex, implying that it has no convergence guarantees based on the existing theory.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Stability beyond Bounded Differences: Sharp Generalization Bounds under Finite $L_p$ Moments

    stat.ML 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Develops sharp concentration inequalities under finite Lp moments extending McDiarmid's bounded differences, then derives high-probability generalization bounds for ERM, transductive regression, and meta-learning unde...

  2. Stabilized Proximal Point Method via Trust Region Control

    math.OC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A trust-region stabilized proximal point method enforces a displacement condition to achieve linear descent for general nonsmooth convex problems.