Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Rethinking the Trigger-injecting Position in Graph Backdoor Attack

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.02277 v2 pith:P4ZRJPWS submitted 2023-04-05 cs.LG cs.CR

Rethinking the Trigger-injecting Position in Graph Backdoor Attack

classification cs.LG cs.CR
keywords backdoorattacksperformanceattackgraphliasbettergnns
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Backdoor attacks have been demonstrated as a security threat for machine learning models. Traditional backdoor attacks intend to inject backdoor functionality into the model such that the backdoored model will perform abnormally on inputs with predefined backdoor triggers and still retain state-of-the-art performance on the clean inputs. While there are already some works on backdoor attacks on Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), the backdoor trigger in the graph domain is mostly injected into random positions of the sample. There is no work analyzing and explaining the backdoor attack performance when injecting triggers into the most important or least important area in the sample, which we refer to as trigger-injecting strategies MIAS and LIAS, respectively. Our results show that, generally, LIAS performs better, and the differences between the LIAS and MIAS performance can be significant. Furthermore, we explain these two strategies' similar (better) attack performance through explanation techniques, which results in a further understanding of backdoor attacks in GNNs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.