Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Angler: Helping Machine Translation Practitioners Prioritize Model Improvements

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.05967 v1 pith:SHXETZII submitted 2023-04-12 cs.HC cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.HCcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords modelpractitionersmachineanglerprioritizetranslationimprovementsmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning (ML) models can fail in unexpected ways in the real world, but not all model failures are equal. With finite time and resources, ML practitioners are forced to prioritize their model debugging and improvement efforts. Through interviews with 13 ML practitioners at Apple, we found that practitioners construct small targeted test sets to estimate an error's nature, scope, and impact on users. We built on this insight in a case study with machine translation models, and developed Angler, an interactive visual analytics tool to help practitioners prioritize model improvements. In a user study with 7 machine translation experts, we used Angler to understand prioritization practices when the input space is infinite, and obtaining reliable signals of model quality is expensive. Our study revealed that participants could form more interesting and user-focused hypotheses for prioritization by analyzing quantitative summary statistics and qualitatively assessing data by reading sentences.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools