Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Improving Grounded Language Understanding in a Collaborative Environment by Interacting with Agents Through Help Feedback

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.10750 v2 pith:H2GY2XYC submitted 2023-04-21 cs.CL cs.AI

Improving Grounded Language Understanding in a Collaborative Environment by Interacting with Agents Through Help Feedback

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords helplanguageagentinteractiveagentsexplorefeedbackgrounded
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Many approaches to Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks often treat them as single-step problems, where an agent receives an instruction, executes it, and is evaluated based on the final outcome. However, human language is inherently interactive, as evidenced by the back-and-forth nature of human conversations. In light of this, we posit that human-AI collaboration should also be interactive, with humans monitoring the work of AI agents and providing feedback that the agent can understand and utilize. Further, the AI agent should be able to detect when it needs additional information and proactively ask for help. Enabling this scenario would lead to more natural, efficient, and engaging human-AI collaborations. In this work, we explore these directions using the challenging task defined by the IGLU competition, an interactive grounded language understanding task in a MineCraft-like world. We explore multiple types of help players can give to the AI to guide it and analyze the impact of this help in AI behavior, resulting in performance improvements.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents

    cs.AI 2023-08 accept novelty 6.0

    A survey of LLM-based autonomous agents that proposes a unified framework for their construction and reviews applications in social science, natural science, and engineering along with evaluation methods and future di...

  2. A Survey on Code Generation with LLM-based Agents

    cs.SE 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A systematic survey of LLM-powered code generation agents that categorizes single-agent and multi-agent architectures, maps their use across the full software development lifecycle, reviews benchmarks and tools, and o...