Fine-tuning Language Models with Generative Adversarial Reward Modelling
Reviewed by Pithpith:NL6BJQNDopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) has been demonstrated to significantly enhance the performance of large language models (LLMs) by aligning their outputs with desired human values through instruction tuning. However, RLHF is constrained by the expertise and productivity limitations of human evaluators. A response to this downside is to fall back to supervised fine-tuning (SFT) with additional carefully selected expert demonstrations. However, while this method has been proven to be effective, it invariably also leads to increased human-in-the-loop overhead. In this study, we propose another alternative approach: Reinforcement Learning with Generative Adversarial Feedback (RLGAF) to RLHF and SFT, which uses a generative adversarial training style to enable the LLMs to learn useful human expert demonstrations without being directly exposed to the training examples, thus enabling good generalization capabilities while preserving sample efficiency. Our preliminary findings indicate that RLGAF can help align LLMs outputs with competitive performance against RLHF and SFT, while not suffering from their respective inherent restrictions, suggesting promising avenues for further research on automating AI alignment.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Generative Adversarial Post-Training Mitigates Reward Hacking in Live Human-AI Music Interaction
Generative adversarial post-training on policy trajectories mitigates reward hacking and preserves diversity in RL post-trained melody-to-chord accompaniment for live human-AI music interaction.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.