The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2305.12519 · v3 · pith:SKUSTB7J · submitted 2023-05-21 · cs.CL · cs.AI· cs.LG

DPIC: Decoupling Prompt and Intrinsic Characteristics for LLM Generated Text Detection

Reviewed by Pithpith:SKUSTB7Jopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords textdetectioncharacteristicsintrinsicpromptmodelcandidatedpic
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to generate texts that pose risks of misuse, such as plagiarism, planting fake reviews on e-commerce platforms, or creating inflammatory false tweets. Consequently, detecting whether a text is generated by LLMs has become increasingly important. Existing high-quality detection methods usually require access to the interior of the model to extract the intrinsic characteristics. However, since we do not have access to the interior of the black-box model, we must resort to surrogate models, which impacts detection quality. In order to achieve high-quality detection of black-box models, we would like to extract deep intrinsic characteristics of the black-box model generated texts. We view the generation process as a coupled process of prompt and intrinsic characteristics of the generative model. Based on this insight, we propose to decouple prompt and intrinsic characteristics (DPIC) for LLM-generated text detection method. Specifically, given a candidate text, DPIC employs an auxiliary LLM to reconstruct the prompt corresponding to the candidate text, then uses the prompt to regenerate text by the auxiliary LLM, which makes the candidate text and the regenerated text align with their prompts, respectively. Then, the similarity between the candidate text and the regenerated text is used as a detection feature, thus eliminating the prompt in the detection process, which allows the detector to focus on the intrinsic characteristics of the generative model. Compared to the baselines, DPIC has achieved an average improvement of 6.76\% and 2.91\% in detecting texts from different domains generated by GPT4 and Claude3, respectively.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviews

    cs.CL 2024-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A maximum likelihood model estimates 6.5-16.9% of peer-review text at ICLR 2024, NeurIPS 2023, CoRL 2023 and EMNLP 2023 was substantially modified by LLMs, with elevated rates in low-confidence and deadline-close submissions.

  2. Hidden Human-Like Nature of Machine-Generated Texts: Theory and Detection Enhancement

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Reveals hidden human-like spans in machine-generated texts that raise detection complexity and proposes a stacked enhancement framework with hard-EM optimization to improve detectors across LLMs.

  3. Multi-Level Contextual Token Relation Modeling for Machine-Generated Text Detection

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A multi-level framework that models local and global relations among token detection scores to improve machine-generated text detection with low overhead.