pith. sign in

arxiv: 2306.10019 · v2 · pith:H6CY2KDVnew · submitted 2023-05-27 · 💻 cs.CY · cs.CR· cs.SE

Ethical Considerations Towards Protestware

classification 💻 cs.CY cs.CRcs.SE
keywords librariesprotestwaredifferentlibrarymaintainersmaliciousopensoftware
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

A key drawback to using a Open Source third-party library is the risk of introducing malicious attacks. In recently times, these threats have taken a new form, when maintainers turn their Open Source libraries into protestware. This is defined as software containing political messages delivered through these libraries, which can either be malicious or benign. Since developers are willing to freely open-up their software to these libraries, much trust and responsibility are placed on the maintainers to ensure that the library does what it promises to do. Using different frameworks commonly used in AI ethics, we illustrate how an open-source maintainer's decision to protest is influenced by different stakeholders (viz., their membership in the OSS community, their personal views, financial motivations, social status, and moral viewpoints), making protestware a multifaceted and intricate matter.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Open Source Is Not One Thing: A Typology of Open-Source Software Sub-Genres

    cs.CY 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    The authors synthesize a typology of fourteen OSS sub-genres from a review of 3,925 papers and present a research agenda on cross-sub-genre generalization.