REVIEW 2 cited by
Recalibrating Gravitational Wave Phenomenological Waveform Model
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Recalibrating Gravitational Wave Phenomenological Waveform Model
read the original abstract
We investigate the possibility of improving the accuracy of the phenomenological waveform model, IMRPhenomD, by jointly optimizing all the calibration coefficients at once, given a set of numerical relativity (NR) waveforms. When IMRPhenomD was first calibrated to NR waveforms, different parts (i.e., the inspiral, merger, and ringdown) of the waveform were calibrated separately. Using ripple, a library of waveform models compatible with automatic differentiation, we can, for the first time, perform gradient-based optimization on all the waveform coefficients at the same time. This joint optimization process allows us to capture previously ignored correlations between separate parts of the waveform. We found that after recalibration, the median mismatch between the model and NR waveforms decreases by 50%. We further explore how different regions of the source parameter space respond to the optimization procedure. We find that the degree of improvement correlates with the spins of the source. This work shows a promising avenue to help understand and treat systematic error in waveform models.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Impact of numerical-relativity waveform calibration on parametrized post-Einsteinian tests
NR late-inspiral calibration systematics in IMRPhenomD produce false ppE GR violations at O5 SNRs ≳60; an uncertainty-aware baseline restores consistency with GR up to SNR 330.
-
Primordial black holes versus their impersonators at gravitational wave observatories
Fisher-matrix forecasts show Cosmic Explorer and Einstein Telescope can probe sub-solar PBHs to z~3 and distinguish PBHs from neutron stars up to z~0.2 via lack of tidal deformability.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.