REVIEW 5 cited by
Benchmarking Autoregressive Conditional Diffusion Models for Turbulent Flow Simulation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Benchmarking Autoregressive Conditional Diffusion Models for Turbulent Flow Simulation
read the original abstract
Simulating turbulent flows is crucial for a wide range of applications, and machine learning-based solvers are gaining increasing relevance. However, achieving temporal stability when generalizing to longer rollout horizons remains a persistent challenge for learned PDE solvers. In this work, we analyze if fully data-driven fluid solvers that utilize an autoregressive rollout based on conditional diffusion models are a viable option to address this challenge. We investigate accuracy, posterior sampling, spectral behavior, and temporal stability, while requiring that methods generalize to flow parameters beyond the training regime. To quantitatively and qualitatively benchmark the performance of various flow prediction approaches, three challenging 2D scenarios including incompressible and transonic flows, as well as isotropic turbulence are employed. We find that even simple diffusion-based approaches can outperform multiple established flow prediction methods in terms of accuracy and temporal stability, while being on par with state-of-the-art stabilization techniques like unrolling at training time. Such traditional architectures are superior in terms of inference speed, however, the probabilistic nature of diffusion approaches allows for inferring multiple predictions that align with the statistics of the underlying physics. Overall, our benchmark contains three carefully chosen data sets that are suitable for probabilistic evaluation alongside various established flow prediction architectures.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Round-Trip Consistency: Bidirectional Diffusion Models Can Predict Their Own Rollout Errors
A model's forward-then-backward round-trip error predicts, without ensembles or ground truth, how large its actual rollout error will be.
-
One Scale at a Time: Scale-Autoregressive Modeling for Fluid Flow Distributions
Scale-autoregressive modeling (SAR) samples fluid flow distributions hierarchically from coarse to fine resolutions on meshes, achieving lower distributional error and 2-7x faster runtime than diffusion or flow-matchi...
-
FD-Bench: A Modular and Fair Benchmark for Data-driven Fluid Simulation
FD-Bench supplies the first modular, reproducible benchmark and leaderboard for comparing neural PDE solvers on fluid dynamics tasks with direct numerical solver baselines.
-
Problem-Specific Basis Quantum State Readout via Proper Orthogonal Decomposition
PODR precomputes a proper orthogonal decomposition basis from classical solutions to project quantum states onto a minimal set of coefficients for reconstruction, reducing measurements in online quantum simulations.
-
Integrating Fourier Neural Operator with Diffusion Model for Autoregressive Predictions of Three-dimensional Turbulence
DiAFNO, an implicit adaptive Fourier neural operator used as the denoiser inside an EDM diffusion model, gives more accurate autoregressive predictions of 3D turbulence than EDM or dynamic Smagorinsky LES.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.