Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Physically Plausible Full-Body Hand-Object Interaction Synthesis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.07907 v1 pith:44G2YCT3 submitted 2023-09-14 cs.RO cs.CVcs.LG

Physically Plausible Full-Body Hand-Object Interaction Synthesis

classification cs.RO cs.CVcs.LG
keywords taskhand-objectinteractioninteractionsmethodskillapproachdata-driven
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose a physics-based method for synthesizing dexterous hand-object interactions in a full-body setting. While recent advancements have addressed specific facets of human-object interactions, a comprehensive physics-based approach remains a challenge. Existing methods often focus on isolated segments of the interaction process and rely on data-driven techniques that may result in artifacts. In contrast, our proposed method embraces reinforcement learning (RL) and physics simulation to mitigate the limitations of data-driven approaches. Through a hierarchical framework, we first learn skill priors for both body and hand movements in a decoupled setting. The generic skill priors learn to decode a latent skill embedding into the motion of the underlying part. A high-level policy then controls hand-object interactions in these pretrained latent spaces, guided by task objectives of grasping and 3D target trajectory following. It is trained using a novel reward function that combines an adversarial style term with a task reward, encouraging natural motions while fulfilling the task incentives. Our method successfully accomplishes the complete interaction task, from approaching an object to grasping and subsequent manipulation. We compare our approach against kinematics-based baselines and show that it leads to more physically plausible motions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.