Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Large Language Models for Code Analysis: Do LLMs Really Do Their Job?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.12357 v2 pith:QKABYW7I submitted 2023-10-18 cs.SE cs.CR

Large Language Models for Code Analysis: Do LLMs Really Do Their Job?

classification cs.SE cs.CR
keywords codellmsanalysislanguageevaluationlargemodelspotential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in the realm of natural language understanding and programming code processing tasks. Their capacity to comprehend and generate human-like code has spurred research into harnessing LLMs for code analysis purposes. However, the existing body of literature falls short in delivering a systematic evaluation and assessment of LLMs' effectiveness in code analysis, particularly in the context of obfuscated code. This paper seeks to bridge this gap by offering a comprehensive evaluation of LLMs' capabilities in performing code analysis tasks. Additionally, it presents real-world case studies that employ LLMs for code analysis. Our findings indicate that LLMs can indeed serve as valuable tools for automating code analysis, albeit with certain limitations. Through meticulous exploration, this research contributes to a deeper understanding of the potential and constraints associated with utilizing LLMs in code analysis, paving the way for enhanced applications in this critical domain.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AgentModernize: Preserving Business Logic in Legacy Modernization with Multi-Agent LLMs and Behavioral Specification Graphs

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A multi-agent LLM framework with Behavioral Specification Graphs preserves business logic in legacy modernization, achieving non-zero mean BER on all tested scenarios where baseline LLM approaches scored zero.