Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Evaluating Bias and Fairness in Gender-Neutral Pretrained Vision-and-Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.17530 v1 pith:4ND6HOXN submitted 2023-10-26 cs.CV cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.CLcs.LG
keywords biasamplificationmodelsperformancepretrainingbiasesdatafairness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Pretrained machine learning models are known to perpetuate and even amplify existing biases in data, which can result in unfair outcomes that ultimately impact user experience. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the mechanisms behind those prejudicial biases to ensure that model performance does not result in discriminatory behaviour toward certain groups or populations. In this work, we define gender bias as our case study. We quantify bias amplification in pretraining and after fine-tuning on three families of vision-and-language models. We investigate the connection, if any, between the two learning stages, and evaluate how bias amplification reflects on model performance. Overall, we find that bias amplification in pretraining and after fine-tuning are independent. We then examine the effect of continued pretraining on gender-neutral data, finding that this reduces group disparities, i.e., promotes fairness, on VQAv2 and retrieval tasks without significantly compromising task performance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The MedPerturb Dataset: What Non-Content Perturbations Reveal About Human and Clinical LLM Decision Making

    cs.AI 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    MedPerturb finds that LLMs are more sensitive to gender and style changes in clinical text, while medical students are more sensitive to LLM-generated summaries and dialogues, in triage decisions.

Pith tools