REVIEW 2 cited by
LLatrieval: LLM-Verified Retrieval for Verifiable Generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
LLatrieval: LLM-Verified Retrieval for Verifiable Generation
read the original abstract
Verifiable generation aims to let the large language model (LLM) generate text with supporting documents, which enables the user to flexibly verify the answer and makes the LLM's output more reliable. Retrieval plays a crucial role in verifiable generation. Specifically, the retrieved documents not only supplement knowledge to help the LLM generate correct answers, but also serve as supporting evidence for the user to verify the LLM's output. However, the widely used retrievers become the bottleneck of the entire pipeline and limit the overall performance. Their capabilities are usually inferior to LLMs since they often have much fewer parameters than the large language model and have not been demonstrated to scale well to the size of LLMs. If the retriever does not correctly find the supporting documents, the LLM can not generate the correct and verifiable answer, which overshadows the LLM's remarkable abilities. To address these limitations, we propose \LLatrieval (Large Language Model Verified Retrieval), where the LLM updates the retrieval result until it verifies that the retrieved documents can sufficiently support answering the question. Thus, the LLM can iteratively provide feedback to retrieval and facilitate the retrieval result to fully support verifiable generation. Experiments show that LLatrieval significantly outperforms extensive baselines and achieves state-of-the-art results.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Trustworthiness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems: A Survey
Introduces Trust-RAG Compass framework and TRC Bench benchmark to assess RAG trustworthiness across factuality, robustness, fairness, transparency, accountability, and privacy, with evaluations showing performance gap...
-
Beyond Relevance: Utility-Centric Retrieval in the LLM Era
Retrieval systems must prioritize utility for LLM generation quality over traditional relevance metrics, supported by a unified framework distinguishing LLM-agnostic vs specific and context-independent vs dependent utility.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.