Pith. sign in

REVIEW

$\mathbb{Z}_2\times \mathbb{Z}_2$ Equivariant Quantum Neural Networks: Benchmarking against Classical Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.18744 v3 pith:C7M5YOYS submitted 2023-11-30 quant-ph cs.LGhep-phstat.ML

classification quant-phcs.LGhep-phstat.ML
keywords networksneuralmathbbequivariantperformancequantumclassicaldata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of the performance of Equivariant Quantum Neural Networks (EQNN) and Quantum Neural Networks (QNN), juxtaposed against their classical counterparts: Equivariant Neural Networks (ENN) and Deep Neural Networks (DNN). We evaluate the performance of each network with two toy examples for a binary classification task, focusing on model complexity (measured by the number of parameters) and the size of the training data set. Our results show that the $\mathbb{Z}_2\times \mathbb{Z}_2$ EQNN and the QNN provide superior performance for smaller parameter sets and modest training data samples.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools