Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Agent Alignment in Evolving Social Norms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.04620 v4 pith:4O4SKAM4 submitted 2024-01-09 cs.CL cs.AI

Agent Alignment in Evolving Social Norms

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords agentsalignmentnormssocialagentaligninghumanllms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly permeating various domains of human production and life, highlighting the importance of aligning them with human values. The current alignment of AI systems primarily focuses on passively aligning LLMs through human intervention. However, agents possess characteristics like receiving environmental feedback and self-evolution, rendering the LLM alignment methods inadequate. In response, we propose an evolutionary framework for agent evolution and alignment, named EvolutionaryAgent, which transforms agent alignment into a process of evolution and selection under the principle of survival of the fittest. In an environment where social norms continuously evolve, agents better adapted to the current social norms will have a higher probability of survival and proliferation, while those inadequately aligned dwindle over time. Experimental results assessing the agents from multiple perspectives in aligning with social norms demonstrate that EvolutionaryAgent can align progressively better with the evolving social norms while maintaining its proficiency in general tasks. Effectiveness tests conducted on various open and closed-source LLMs as the foundation for agents also prove the applicability of our approach.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Group Selection Promotes Prosocial Prompts in Populations of LLM Agents

    cs.CY 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Group selection on transmitted prompts in LLM agent populations promotes and stabilizes cooperation in social dilemmas while individual selection produces collective defection.

  2. What if Pinocchio Were a Reinforcement Learning Agent: A Normative End-to-End Pipeline

    cs.AI 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The thesis presents Pino, an end-to-end pipeline that supervises reinforcement learning agents with argumentation-based normative advisors, introduces an algorithm for automatic argument extraction, and defines a miti...