REVIEW 3 cited by
Enhancing Emotional Generation Capability of Large Language Models via Emotional Chain-of-Thought
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Enhancing Emotional Generation Capability of Large Language Models via Emotional Chain-of-Thought
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in various emotion recognition tasks, thereby piquing the research community's curiosity for exploring their potential in emotional intelligence. However, several issues in the field of emotional generation tasks remain unresolved, including human preference alignment and emotional generation assessment. In this paper, we propose the Emotional Chain-of-Thought (ECoT), a plug-and-play prompting method that enhances the performance of LLMs on various emotional generation tasks by aligning with human emotional intelligence guidelines. To assess the reliability of ECoT, we propose an automated model-based evaluation method called Emotional Generation Score (EGS). EGS incorporates Goleman's Emotional Intelligence Theory as a consensus of human experts, providing a new perspective on the evaluation of emotional generation tasks. Extensive experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of ECoT and EGS. Further, we discuss the promise of LLMs in the field of emotional intelligence and present key insights into the LLMs with the ECoT in emotional generation tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
MeetingToM: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs on Theory-of-Mind Reasoning in Multi-Party Meetings
A new benchmark shows MLLMs underperform humans on meeting Theory-of-Mind tasks, especially detecting pseudo-consensus and hidden dissent.
-
Is Human-Like Text Liked by Humans? Multilingual Human Detection and Preference Against AI
Humans detect AI-generated text at 87.6% accuracy across 9 languages and 9 domains, outperforming prior near-random results, and do not always prefer human-written text when the source is unclear.
-
Intelligent Agents with Emotional Intelligence: Current Trends, Challenges, and Future Prospects
A holistic survey of affective computing for intelligent agents covering emotion understanding via multimodal data, affective cognition, emotional expression synthesis, key challenges, and future directions emphasizin...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.