pith. sign in

arxiv: 2401.12120 · v1 · pith:XPZ5FHW5new · submitted 2024-01-22 · 💻 cs.GT · cs.CR· cs.DC· econ.TH

Centralization in Block Building and Proposer-Builder Separation

classification 💻 cs.GT cs.CRcs.DCecon.TH
keywords blockheterogeneityheterogeneousproposer-builderrewardsseparationstakingcentralization
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The goal of this paper is to rigorously interrogate conventional wisdom about centralization in block-building (due to, e.g., MEV and private order flow) and the outsourcing of block-building by validators to specialists (i.e., proposer-builder separation): 1. Does heterogeneity in skills and knowledge across block producers inevitably lead to centralization? 2. Does proposer-builder separation eliminate heterogeneity and preserve decentralization among proposers? This paper develops mathematical models and results that offer answers to these questions: 1. In a game-theoretic model with endogenous staking, heterogeneous block producer rewards, and staking costs, we quantify the extent to which heterogeneous rewards lead to concentration in the equilibrium staking distribution. 2. In a stochastic model in which heterogeneous block producers repeatedly reinvest rewards into staking, we quantify, as a function of the block producer heterogeneity, the rate at which stake concentrates on the most sophisticated block producers. 3. In a model with heterogeneous proposers and specialized builders, we quantify, as a function of the competitiveness of the builder ecosystem, the extent to which proposer-builder separation reduces the heterogeneity in rewards across different proposers. Our models and results take advantage of connections to contest design, P\'olya urn processes, and auction theory.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Imperfect Commitment in Maximal Extractable Value Auctions

    cs.GT 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Imperfect commitment in MEV auctions creates piecewise equilibria where searchers mix risky and safe bids, with empirical decomposition revealing high replicability exposure in naked arbitrage and liquidations but low...

  2. Becoming Immutable: How Ethereum is Made

    econ.GN 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Analysis of non-winning Ethereum blocks shows 21% of user transactions are delayed and that arbitrage bot activity in the same block affects swap execution probability and price.

  3. Imperfect Commitment in Maximal Extractable Value Auctions

    cs.GT 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Models imperfect commitment in MEV auctions via builder defection and estimates type-specific replicability showing heterogeneity in exposed surplus across opportunity types.