REVIEW 3 cited by
Coordinated Flaw Disclosure for AI: Beyond Security Vulnerabilities
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Harm reporting in Artificial Intelligence (AI) currently lacks a structured process for disclosing and addressing algorithmic flaws, relying largely on an ad-hoc approach. This contrasts sharply with the well-established Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure (CVD) ecosystem in software security. While global efforts to establish frameworks for AI transparency and collaboration are underway, the unique challenges presented by machine learning (ML) models demand a specialized approach. To address this gap, we propose implementing a Coordinated Flaw Disclosure (CFD) framework tailored to the complexities of ML and AI issues. This paper reviews the evolution of ML disclosure practices, from ad hoc reporting to emerging participatory auditing methods, and compares them with cybersecurity norms. Our framework introduces innovations such as extended model cards, dynamic scope expansion, an independent adjudication panel, and an automated verification process. We also outline a forthcoming real-world pilot of CFD. We argue that CFD could significantly enhance public trust in AI systems. By balancing organizational and community interests, CFD aims to improve AI accountability in a rapidly evolving technological landscape.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Pre-Deployment Information Sharing: A Zoning Taxonomy for Precursory Capabilities
A zoning taxonomy for precursory AI capabilities underpins four recommendations specifying pre-deployment information sharing under the Frontier AI Safety Commitments.
-
The Pitfalls of "Security by Obscurity" And What They Mean for Transparent AI
Security's hard-won transparency practices, from Kerckhoffs' principle to vulnerability disclosure, form three transferable themes for AI transparency efforts.
-
Generative AI regulation can learn from social media regulation
Regulatory lessons from social media, especially transparency, researcher access, trust and safety, and a global perspective, can be transferred to generative AI regulation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.