pith. sign in

arxiv: 2402.11170 · v1 · pith:7PNJ7XEPnew · submitted 2024-02-17 · 💰 econ.GN · cs.CR· cs.CY· cs.DB· cs.DC· q-fin.EC

Analyzing Reward Dynamics and Decentralization in Ethereum 2.0: An Advanced Data Engineering Workflow and Comprehensive Datasets for Proof-of-Stake Incentives

classification 💰 econ.GN cs.CRcs.CYcs.DBcs.DCq-fin.EC
keywords ethereumblockchaincomprehensiveconsensusdatadecentralizationrewardanalytical
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Ethereum 2.0, as the preeminent smart contract blockchain platform, guarantees the precise execution of applications without third-party intervention. At its core, this system leverages the Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism, which utilizes a stochastic process to select validators for block proposal and validation, consequently rewarding them for their contributions. However, the implementation of blockchain technology often diverges from its central tenet of decentralized consensus, presenting significant analytical challenges. Our study collects consensus reward data from the Ethereum Beacon chain and conducts a comprehensive analysis of reward distribution and evolution, categorizing them into attestation, proposer and sync committee rewards. To evaluate the degree of decentralization in PoS Ethereum, we apply several inequality indices, including the Shannon entropy, the Gini Index, the Nakamoto Coefficient, and the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI). Our comprehensive dataset is publicly available on Harvard Dataverse, and our analytical methodologies are accessible via GitHub, promoting open-access research. Additionally, we provide insights on utilizing our data for future investigations focused on assessing, augmenting, and refining the decentralization, security, and efficiency of blockchain systems.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Trust Dynamics in Cryptocurrency Markets: Centralized vs. Decentralized Exchanges

    econ.GN 2024-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    FTX collapse produced price declines and capital reallocation from CEX to DEX, with topic modeling indicating holiday discourse obscured trust concerns in centralized exchange forums.