Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

ChatCite: LLM Agent with Human Workflow Guidance for Comparative Literature Summary

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.02574 v1 pith:P5ZDTRBB submitted 2024-03-05 cs.IR cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.IRcs.AIcs.CL
keywords literatureagentchatcitecomparativehumansummaryresearchstep
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The literature review is an indispensable step in the research process. It provides the benefit of comprehending the research problem and understanding the current research situation while conducting a comparative analysis of prior works. However, literature summary is challenging and time consuming. The previous LLM-based studies on literature review mainly focused on the complete process, including literature retrieval, screening, and summarization. However, for the summarization step, simple CoT method often lacks the ability to provide extensive comparative summary. In this work, we firstly focus on the independent literature summarization step and introduce ChatCite, an LLM agent with human workflow guidance for comparative literature summary. This agent, by mimicking the human workflow, first extracts key elements from relevant literature and then generates summaries using a Reflective Incremental Mechanism. In order to better evaluate the quality of the generated summaries, we devised a LLM-based automatic evaluation metric, G-Score, in refer to the human evaluation criteria. The ChatCite agent outperformed other models in various dimensions in the experiments. The literature summaries generated by ChatCite can also be directly used for drafting literature reviews.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MemGuide: Intent-Driven Memory Selection for Goal-Oriented Multi-Session LLM Agents

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MemGuide retrieves and filters past dialogue memories by intent and missing slots, and on its new synthetic benchmark MS-TOD it improves task success by 11 points and shortens dialogues by 2.84 turns.

Pith tools