REVIEW 3 cited by
am-AMM: An Auction-Managed Automated Market Maker
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Automated market makers (AMMs) have emerged as the dominant market mechanism for trading on decentralized exchanges implemented on blockchains. This paper presents a single mechanism that targets two important unsolved problems for AMMs: reducing losses to informed orderflow, and maximizing revenue from uninformed orderflow. The ``auction-managed AMM'' works by running a censorship-resistant onchain auction for the right to temporarily act as ``pool manager'' for a constant-product AMM. The pool manager sets the swap fee rate on the pool, and also receives the accrued fees from swaps. The pool manager can exclusively capture some arbitrage by trading against the pool in response to small price movements, and also can set swap fees incorporating price sensitivity of retail orderflow and adapting to changing market conditions, with the benefits from both ultimately accruing to liquidity providers. Liquidity providers can enter and exit the pool freely in response to changing rent, though they must pay a small fee on withdrawal. We prove that under certain assumptions, this AMM should have higher liquidity in equilibrium than any standard, fixed-fee AMM.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Optimal Fees for Liquidity Provision in Automated Market Makers
Optimal AMM fees sit just below all-in CEX trading costs in normal markets, rise with volatility, and become effectively infinite (halt trading) in extreme volatility.
-
Causal Effects of Protocol-Fee Changes on Liquidity Provision in Automated Market Makers
A matched-overlap event-study DiD of Uniswap’s protocol-fee switch finds no large short-run average LP liquidity, depth, or participation response to take-rate cuts.
-
Optimal Dynamic Fees in Automated Market Makers
In a constant-function market maker, optimal dynamic fees balance arbitrage deterrence against noise-trader attraction, and a fee that is linear in inventory and external price is a near-optimal approximation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.