REVIEW 2 cited by
Chinese Offensive Language Detection:Current Status and Future Directions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Chinese Offensive Language Detection:Current Status and Future Directions
read the original abstract
Despite the considerable efforts being made to monitor and regulate user-generated content on social media platforms, the pervasiveness of offensive language, such as hate speech or cyberbullying, in the digital space remains a significant challenge. Given the importance of maintaining a civilized and respectful online environment, there is an urgent and growing need for automatic systems capable of detecting offensive speech in real time. However, developing effective systems for processing languages such as Chinese presents a significant challenge, owing to the language's complex and nuanced nature, which makes it difficult to process automatically. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of offensive language detection in Chinese, examining current benchmarks and approaches and highlighting specific models and tools for addressing the unique challenges of detecting offensive language in this complex language. The primary objective of this survey is to explore the existing techniques and identify potential avenues for further research that can address the cultural and linguistic complexities of Chinese.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
KZ-SafetyPrompts: A Kazakh Safety Evaluation Prompt Dataset for Large Language Models
Introduces a new dataset of 5,717 Kazakh safety evaluation prompts in 11 categories with baseline refusal rates showing English-only gaps.
-
Harder to Defend: Towards Chinese Toxicity Attacks via Implicit Enhancement and Obfuscation Rewriting
CITA generates Chinese implicit toxicity samples that cause 69.48% average missed detection across seven tested detectors while preserving harmfulness, and the same data improves robustness when used to fine-tune a CI...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.