Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Chinese Offensive Language Detection:Current Status and Future Directions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.18314 v3 pith:MWQ3CRRK submitted 2024-03-27 cs.CL cs.AI

Chinese Offensive Language Detection:Current Status and Future Directions

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords languageoffensivechinesechallengecomplexcurrentdetectingdetection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Despite the considerable efforts being made to monitor and regulate user-generated content on social media platforms, the pervasiveness of offensive language, such as hate speech or cyberbullying, in the digital space remains a significant challenge. Given the importance of maintaining a civilized and respectful online environment, there is an urgent and growing need for automatic systems capable of detecting offensive speech in real time. However, developing effective systems for processing languages such as Chinese presents a significant challenge, owing to the language's complex and nuanced nature, which makes it difficult to process automatically. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of offensive language detection in Chinese, examining current benchmarks and approaches and highlighting specific models and tools for addressing the unique challenges of detecting offensive language in this complex language. The primary objective of this survey is to explore the existing techniques and identify potential avenues for further research that can address the cultural and linguistic complexities of Chinese.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. KZ-SafetyPrompts: A Kazakh Safety Evaluation Prompt Dataset for Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Introduces a new dataset of 5,717 Kazakh safety evaluation prompts in 11 categories with baseline refusal rates showing English-only gaps.

  2. Harder to Defend: Towards Chinese Toxicity Attacks via Implicit Enhancement and Obfuscation Rewriting

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    CITA generates Chinese implicit toxicity samples that cause 69.48% average missed detection across seven tested detectors while preserving harmfulness, and the same data improves robustness when used to fine-tune a CI...