The Use of Generative Search Engines for Knowledge Work and Complex Tasks
read the original abstract
Until recently, search engines were the predominant method for people to access online information. The recent emergence of large language models (LLMs) has given machines new capabilities such as the ability to generate new digital artifacts like text, images, code etc., resulting in a new tool, a generative search engine, which combines the capabilities of LLMs with a traditional search engine. Through the empirical analysis of Bing Copilot (Bing Chat), one of the first publicly available generative search engines, we analyze the types and complexity of tasks that people use Bing Copilot for compared to Bing Search. Findings indicate that people use the generative search engine for more knowledge work tasks that are higher in cognitive complexity than were commonly done with a traditional search engine.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Adopt $\neq$ Adapt: Longitudinal Analyses of LLM Conversations in the Wild
Longitudinal analysis of Bing Copilot users shows sticky individual LLM habits, activity-level differences in task complexity and success, and that WildChat is skewed toward power users.
-
From Searchable to Non-Searchable: Generative AI and Information Diversity in Online Information Seeking
ChatGPT expands the diversity of user questions (80% non-searchable) but delivers less diverse responses than Google for comparable queries, creating a feedback loop that may constrain information exposure.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.