pith. sign in

arxiv: 2405.00809 · v2 · submitted 2024-05-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.GA· gr-qc

Kinetic Sunyaev Zel'dovich velocity reconstruction from Planck and unWISE

Richard Bloch , Matthew C. Johnson This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 01:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GAgr-qc
keywords kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effectremote dipole fieldvelocity reconstructionquadratic estimatoroptical depth biasPlanck CMBunWISE galaxiescosmic infrared background
0
0 comments X

The pith

Planck CMB maps crossed with unWISE galaxies reconstruct the remote dipole field and bound its amplitude bias below 1.04 at 68 percent confidence.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops and applies a quadratic estimator to extract the remote dipole field from the kSZ-induced cross-correlation between Planck temperature maps and the unWISE galaxy catalog. After isolating and subtracting the dominant contaminant from cosmic infrared background coupling to galaxy systematics, the resulting maps match the expected reconstruction noise. This enables a direct constraint on the multiplicative optical depth bias parameter that sets the overall amplitude of the remote dipole signal. A reader would care because the result tests whether existing data already suffice to measure large-scale bulk velocities and validates the modeling assumptions needed for future higher-precision applications.

Core claim

A quadratic estimator applied to Planck frequency maps and component-separated CMB maps together with the unWISE redshift catalog reconstructs the remote dipole field; after mitigation of the CIB-galaxy systematics coupling the reconstruction is noise-limited, and the data constrain the optical depth bias b_v to less than 1.04 at 68 percent , consistent with the fiducial value of unity under a simple free-electron model.

What carries the argument

The quadratic estimator for the remote dipole field, which isolates the statistically anisotropic kSZ cross-correlation between CMB temperature and galaxy overdensity to recover the radial bulk velocity field.

If this is right

  • Reconstructions from individual Planck frequency maps and from a variety of component-separated maps remain consistent with noise once the CIB-galaxy coupling is minimized.
  • The fiducial signal model with b_v equal to 1 lies inside the measured 68 percent interval.
  • The achieved noise level and contaminant control support an optimistic outlook for kSZ velocity reconstruction with near-term data sets.
  • The same estimator and cleaning pipeline can be applied to other CMB and galaxy data combinations to produce additional remote-dipole maps.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the same quadratic estimator to deeper galaxy samples or higher-resolution CMB maps would directly test whether the current noise floor is set by foregrounds or by the underlying signal.
  • The demonstrated cleaning procedure for CIB contamination provides a template that can be adapted to other cross-correlations involving infrared backgrounds and large-scale structure tracers.
  • A null result in future data would tighten the bound on b_v and thereby limit the allowable uncertainty in electron-density modeling for kSZ analyses.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes a simple model for the distribution of free electrons when forecasting the signal-to-noise and interpreting the reconstruction amplitude.

What would settle it

A reconstruction whose amplitude after the same cleaning procedure lies more than one sigma above the forecasted noise level, or a direct measurement of b_v exceeding 1.04 at 68 percent , would falsify the consistency claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2405.00809 by Matthew C. Johnson, Richard Bloch.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The unWISE blue sample galaxy density. Small den [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The reconstruction mask applied to all reconstruc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Normalized redshift distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The velocity window function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The predicted signal and noise power spectra for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The predicted cross-correlation between the galaxy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Dipole field reconstructions based on the Planck 100, 143, 217, and 353 GHz individual frequency maps and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Dipole field reconstructions based on the Planck SMICA and Commander CMB maps and the unWISE blue sample [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Power spectra of the masked reconstructed dipole field after the monopole and dipole have been subtracted. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Power spectrum of the masked, monopole/dipole [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. The monopole (left) and dipole magnitude (right) for masked reconstructions at each frequency (blue) compared with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Power spectra for reconstructions based on SMICA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. The one-point function of the dipole field reconstruction plotted against the predicted normal product distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. The cross-power between SMICA (black) and Com [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. The posterior probability distribution over [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. The weighted average of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. The estimator autopower spectrum evaluated with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_18.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The kinetic Sunyaev Zel'dovich (kSZ) effect is a blackbody cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature anisotropy induced by Thomson scattering off free electrons in bulk motion with respect to the CMB rest frame. The statistically anisotropic cross-correlation between the CMB and galaxy surveys induced by the kSZ effect encodes the radial bulk velocity (more generally, the remote dipole field), which can be efficiently reconstructed using a quadratic estimator. Here, we develop a quadratic estimator for the remote dipole field for use with data from the Planck satellite and the unWISE galaxy redshift catalog. With this data combination, we forecast a signal-to-noise of order unity within $\Lambda$CDM assuming a simple model for the distribution of free electrons. Using reconstructions based on individual frequency temperature maps and a variety of component separated CMB maps, we characterize the impact of foregrounds and systematics. The dominant contaminant is a coupling between the cosmic infrared background and large-scale galaxy survey systematics. We develop a method to minimize this effect, and demonstrate that after doing so the reconstructions are consistent with the expected level and properties of reconstruction noise. We use this reconstruction to constrain the multiplicative optical depth bias characterizing the amplitude of the remote dipole field to $b_v < 1.04$ at $68 \%$ confidence. Our fiducial signal model with $b_v =1$ is consistent with this measurement. Our results support an optimistic future for kSZ velocity reconstruction with near-term datasets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a quadratic estimator to reconstruct the remote dipole field from the kSZ effect using Planck CMB temperature maps cross-correlated with the unWISE galaxy catalog. It reports an S/N forecast of order unity under a fiducial free-electron model, characterizes and mitigates foregrounds (notably CIB-galaxy systematics coupling), verifies that cleaned reconstructions match expected noise properties, and extracts a data-driven upper limit b_v < 1.04 (68% CL) on the multiplicative optical-depth bias, finding consistency with the fiducial b_v = 1 model.

Significance. If the result holds, the work provides a concrete demonstration that kSZ velocity reconstruction is feasible with near-term data after explicit foreground mitigation and noise-consistency tests. The data-driven nature of the b_v constraint after cleaning is a positive feature. The analysis would gain further weight from explicit quantification of modeling assumptions that enter the amplitude calibration.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the reported b_v < 1.04 (68% CL) upper limit is obtained by scaling the measured reconstruction amplitude against the expected remote-dipole signal computed from a single fiducial free-electron distribution model. Because b_v is defined as a multiplicative rescaling of that model's amplitude, any change in the assumed electron bias, redshift evolution, or hydrodynamical realization directly rescales the inferred bound and the consistency statement with b_v = 1. No variations of this model or propagation of its uncertainty into the b_v posterior are presented.
  2. [Abstract] The S/N forecast of order unity (abstract) likewise rests on the same unvaried electron model. A sensitivity test varying the model parameters would be required to establish that the forecast remains robust and that the measurement interpretation is not an artifact of the particular choice.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that reconstructions from individual frequency maps and component-separated maps were used to characterize foregrounds, but the main text should tabulate the quantitative impact of each map choice on the final b_v limit and noise properties.
  2. Details on covariance estimation and error-bar construction for the b_v constraint are referenced only at a high level; explicit equations or a dedicated subsection would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on the model dependence of our results. We respond point-by-point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the reported b_v < 1.04 (68% CL) upper limit is obtained by scaling the measured reconstruction amplitude against the expected remote-dipole signal computed from a single fiducial free-electron distribution model. Because b_v is defined as a multiplicative rescaling of that model's amplitude, any change in the assumed electron bias, redshift evolution, or hydrodynamical realization directly rescales the inferred bound and the consistency statement with b_v = 1. No variations of this model or propagation of its uncertainty into the b_v posterior are presented.

    Authors: We agree that the reported b_v upper limit is defined as a multiplicative rescaling relative to the amplitude of the chosen fiducial free-electron model, so variations in electron bias, redshift evolution, or hydrodynamical details would directly rescale the numerical bound and the consistency statement. The manuscript presents the constraint in this relative sense and uses a standard fiducial model drawn from the literature. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit discussion paragraph clarifying this definition, the rationale for the fiducial choice, and the fact that the bound is model-dependent in the manner noted by the referee. A full Monte-Carlo propagation of uncertainties from alternative electron models would require additional external simulations and is left for future work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The S/N forecast of order unity (abstract) likewise rests on the same unvaried electron model. A sensitivity test varying the model parameters would be required to establish that the forecast remains robust and that the measurement interpretation is not an artifact of the particular choice.

    Authors: The S/N forecast of order unity is computed under the same fiducial free-electron model used for the b_v analysis. We will revise the text to state explicitly that the forecast applies to this model and that changes in the electron distribution would rescale the expected signal (and thus the forecast S/N) proportionally. The core data analysis and foreground-mitigation results are independent of the forecast model; the forecast is provided only to indicate the expected performance of the estimator with current data. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; central constraint is data-driven comparison to fixed model

full rationale

The paper derives a quadratic estimator for the remote dipole field from first principles, applies it to Planck and unWISE data after foreground cleaning and noise tests, and obtains a reconstruction whose amplitude is then compared to the expected signal under a fixed fiducial electron distribution to bound the rescaling parameter b_v. No equation or step reduces the reported b_v limit or consistency statement to a fit of the same data or to a self-citation chain; the electron model enters only as an external assumption for converting amplitude to b_v, while the reconstruction and its consistency checks remain independent of that model. This matches the default expectation of a non-circular analysis.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The reconstruction and b_v constraint rest on an assumed electron distribution model and on the effectiveness of the CIB-systematics cleaning step; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • b_v
    Multiplicative scaling factor for the remote dipole amplitude; the paper reports an upper limit rather than a fitted central value.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Simple model for the distribution of free electrons
    Used both for the S/N forecast and to interpret the amplitude of the reconstructed field.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5794 in / 1381 out tokens · 30537 ms · 2026-05-24T01:42:53.682431+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Measurement of the galaxy-velocity power spectrum of DESI tracers with the kinematic Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect using DESI DR2 and ACT DR6

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    DESI DR2 and ACT DR6 data yield 17σ LRG-velocity, 8.3σ ELG-velocity, and 6.8σ QSO-velocity detections plus a 3.1σ velocity-velocity signal, producing f_NL^loc = 15.9_{-34.4}^{+34.6} from the velocity field.

  2. Measuring cosmic bulk flow with kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich velocity reconstruction

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich reconstruction from WISExSuperCOSMOS and unWISE galaxies with Planck data yields tight upper limits on bulk velocities consistent with LambdaCDM out to 2000 h^{-1} Mpc while showing tension ...

  3. Probing Dark Energy Microphysics with kSZ Tomography

    astro-ph.CO 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0

    Fisher-matrix forecasts for LSST- and CMB-S4-like surveys show kSZ tomography tightens constraints on dark energy parameters w0 and wa by 15% and 32% while assessing detectability of perturbations for different sound speeds.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 25 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The galaxy-optical depth cross-power ¯C τ g ℓ is computed from the model (Eq

    Compute input spectra: We first pre-compute the various quantities necessary to construct the estimator. The galaxy-optical depth cross-power ¯C τ g ℓ is computed from the model (Eq. (37)) eval- uated at the reference redshift ¯ z = 0 .68, cor- responding to ¯ χ = 2505 Mpc. Where spec- tra are computed at a reference multipole, we use ¯ℓ = 2000. We estima...

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    Filter: The inputs to the pixel-space quadratic es- timator are the filtered CMB field ξ(ˆn) and galaxy field ζ(ˆn) defined in Eq. (20). To construct ξ(ˆn) we perform a forward spherical harmonic trans- form of the unmasked maps at healpix resolution Nside = 2048. We then apply a high- and low-pass filter that nulls all harmonic coefficients ℓ < 100 and ℓ...

    work page 2048

  3. [3]

    (21) is simply the product of the ξ(ˆn) and ζ(ˆn) maps at full resolution of Nside = 2048, rescaled by N defined in Eq

    Assemble and analyze the reconstruction: The quadratic estimator for the dipole field Eq. (21) is simply the product of the ξ(ˆn) and ζ(ˆn) maps at full resolution of Nside = 2048, rescaled by N defined in Eq. (19). For visualization purposes, be- low we filter maps with a Gaussian kernel of width σFWHM = 10 ◦. For analysis, we apply the recon- struction ...

    work page 2048

  4. [4]

    Planck Collaboration, Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck, Astronomy & As- trophysics 641, A1 (2020)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Louis et al

    T. Louis et al. , The atacama cosmology telescope: two- season actpol spectra and parameters, Journal of Cos- mology and Astroparticle Physics 2017 (06), 031–031

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    J. E. Carlstrom et al., The 10 meter south pole telescope, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 123, 568 (2011)

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    The Simons Observatory Collaboration, The Simons Observatory: science goals and forecasts, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (02), 056, arXiv:1808.07445v2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    K. N. Abazajian et al. (CMB-S4), CMB-S4 Science Book, First Edition, (2016), arXiv:1610.02743 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  9. [9]

    R. A. Sunyaev and Y. B. Zeldovich, The velocity of clus- ters of galaxies relative to the microwave background. The possibility of its measurement, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 190, 413 (1980)

    work page 1980

  10. [10]

    Hand et al., Evidence of Galaxy Cluster Motions with the Kinematic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect, Physical Re- view Letters 109, 041101 (2012)

    N. Hand et al., Evidence of Galaxy Cluster Motions with the Kinematic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect, Physical Re- view Letters 109, 041101 (2012). 24

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    F. D. Bernardis et al., Detection of the pairwise kinematic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect with BOSS DR11 and the At- acama Cosmology Telescope, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2017 (03), 008

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Z. Chen, P. Zhang, X. Yang, and Y. Zheng, Detection of pairwise kSZ effect with DESI galaxy clusters and Planck, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical So- ciety 510, 5916 (2022), arXiv:2109.04092

    work page arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    Kusiak, B

    A. Kusiak, B. Bolliet, S. Ferraro, J. C. Hill, and A. Krolewski, Constraining the baryon abundance with the kinematic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect: Projected-field detection using Planck, WMAP, and unWISE, Phys. Rev. D 104, 043518 (2021), arXiv:2102.01068 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Schaan et al

    E. Schaan et al. (Atacama Cosmology Telescope Col- laboration), Atacama cosmology telescope: Combined kinematic and thermal sunyaev-zel’dovich measurements from boss cmass and lowz halos, Phys. Rev. D 103, 063513 (2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    J. C. Hill, S. Ferraro, N. Battaglia, J. Liu, and D. N. Spergel, Kinematic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect with Pro- jected Fields: A Novel Probe of the Baryon Distribution with Planck, WMAP, and WISE Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 051301 (2016), arXiv:1603.01608 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  16. [16]

    The Kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect with Projected Fields II: prospects, challenges, and comparison with simulations

    S. Ferraro, J. C. Hill, N. Battaglia, J. Liu, and D. N. Spergel, Kinematic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect with pro- jected fields. II. Prospects, challenges, and compari- son with simulations, Phys. Rev. D 94, 123526 (2016), arXiv:1605.02722 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  17. [17]

    The dark flow induced small scale kinetic Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect

    P. Zhang, The dark flow induced small scale kinetic Sun- yaev Zel’dovich effect, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 407, L36 (2010), arXiv:1004.0990 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  18. [18]

    Confirmation of the Copernican principle at Gpc radial scale and above from the kinetic Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect power spectrum

    P. Zhang and A. Stebbins, Confirmation of the Coperni- can Principle at Gpc Radial Scale and above from the Ki- netic Sunyaev Zel’dovich Effect Power Spectrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 041301 (2011), arXiv:1009.3967 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  19. [19]

    Testing eternal inflation with the kinetic Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect

    P. Zhang and M. C. Johnson, Testing eternal inflation with the kinetic Sunyaev Zel’dovich effect, JCAP06, 046, arXiv:1501.00511 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    J. I. Cayuso and M. C. Johnson, Towards testing CMB anomalies using the kinetic and polarized Sunyaev- Zel’dovich effects, Phys. Rev. D 101, 123508 (2020), arXiv:1904.10981 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    Constraining local non-Gaussianities with kSZ tomography,

    M. M¨ unchmeyer, M. S. Madhavacheril, S. Ferraro, M. C. Johnson, and K. M. Smith, Constraining lo- cal non-Gaussianities with kinetic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich tomography, Physical Review D 100, 083508 (2019), arXiv:1810.13424

    work page arXiv 2019

  22. [22]

    Contreras, M

    D. Contreras, M. C. Johnson, and J. B. Mertens, Towards detection of relativistic effects in galaxy number counts using kSZ Tomography, JCAP10, 024, arXiv:1904.10033 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 1904

  23. [23]

    Anil Kumar, G

    N. Anil Kumar, G. Sato-Polito, M. Kamionkowski, and S. C. Hotinli, Primordial trispectrum from ki- netic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich tomography, Phys. Rev. D106, 063533 (2022), arXiv:2205.03423 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Observational Consequences of Dark Energy Decay

    U.-L. Pen and P. Zhang, Observational Consequences of Dark Energy Decay, Phys. Rev. D 89, 063009 (2014), arXiv:1202.0107 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  25. [25]

    Pan and M

    Z. Pan and M. C. Johnson, Forecasted constraints on modified gravity from Sunyaev-Zel’dovich to- mography, Physical Review D 100, 083522 (2019), arXiv:1906.04208

    work page arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    S. C. Hotinli, J. B. Mertens, M. C. Johnson, and M. Kamionkowski, Probing correlated compen- sated isocurvature perturbations using scale-dependent galaxy bias, Physical Review D 100, 103528 (2019), arXiv:1908.08953

    work page arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    N. A. Kumar, S. C. Hotinli, and M. Kamionkowski, Un- correlated compensated isocurvature perturbations from kinetic Sunyaev-Zeldovich tomography, Phys. Rev. D 107, 043504 (2023), arXiv:2208.02829 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    J. Shao, P. Zhang, W. Lin, Y. Jing, and J. Pan, The kinetic SZ tomography with spectroscopic redshift sur- veys, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 413, 628 (2011), arXiv:1004.1301 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  29. [29]

    Analyzing the cosmic variance limit of remote dipole measurements of the cosmic microwave background using the large-scale kinetic Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect

    A. Terrana, M.-J. Harris, and M. C. Johnson, Analyz- ing the cosmic variance limit of remote dipole measure- ments of the cosmic microwave background using the large-scale kinetic Sunyaev Zel’dovich effect, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2017 (02), 040, arXiv:1610.06919v2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  30. [30]

    Deutsch, E

    A.-S. Deutsch, E. Dimastrogiovanni, M. C. Johnson, M. M¨ unchmeyer, and A. Terrana, Reconstruction of the remote dipole and quadrupole fields from the kinetic Sun- yaev Zel’dovich and polarized Sunyaev Zel’dovich effects, Physical Review D 98, 123501 (2018)

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    K. M. Smith, M. S. Madhavacheril, M. M¨ unchmeyer, S. Ferraro, U. Giri, and M. C. Johnson, KSZ tomography and the bispectrum, (2018), arXiv:1810.13423

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  32. [32]

    J. I. Cayuso, M. C. Johnson, and J. B. Mertens, Simu- lated reconstruction of the remote dipole field using the kinetic Sunyaev Zel’dovich effect, Physical Review D 98, 063502 (2018), arXiv:1806.01290

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    Cayuso, R

    J. Cayuso, R. Bloch, S. C. Hotinli, M. C. Johnson, and F. McCarthy, Velocity reconstruction with the cosmic microwave background and galaxy surveys, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2023 (02), 051, arXiv:2111.11526

    work page arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Kvasiuk and M

    Y. Kvasiuk and M. M¨ unchmeyer, Autodifferentiable likelihood pipeline for the cross-correlation of CMB and large-scale structure due to the kinetic Sunyaev- Zeldovich effect, Phys. Rev. D 109, 083515 (2024), arXiv:2305.08903 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Contreras, F

    D. Contreras, F. McCarthy, and M. C. Johnson, Maximum likelihood kinetic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich veloc- ity reconstruction, Phys. Rev. D 107, 023521 (2023), arXiv:2205.15779 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    Giri and K

    U. Giri and K. M. Smith, Exploring KSZ velocity recon- struction with N-body simulations and the halo model, JCAP 09, 028, arXiv:2010.07193 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2010

  37. [37]

    LSST Science and LSST Project Collaborations, LSST Science Book, Version 2.0, (2009), arXiv:0912.0201

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  38. [38]

    The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design

    A. Aghamousa et al. (DESI), The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design, (2016), arXiv:1611.00036 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  39. [39]

    E. L. Wright et al. , The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE): Mission Description and Initial On- orbit Performance, The Astronomical Journal 140, 1868 (2010), arXiv:1008.0031 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  40. [40]

    Initial Performance of the NEOWISE Reactivation Mission

    A. Mainzer et al. , Initial Performance of the NEOWISE Reactivation Mission, The Astrophysical Journal 792, 30 (2014), arXiv:1406.6025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  41. [41]

    Lang, unwise: Unblurred coadds of the wise imaging, The Astronomical Journal 147, 108 (2014)

    D. Lang, unwise: Unblurred coadds of the wise imaging, The Astronomical Journal 147, 108 (2014)

    work page 2014

  42. [42]

    A. M. Meisner, D. Lang, and D. J. Schlegel, Full-depth coadds of the wise and first-year neowise-reactivation im- 25 ages, The Astronomical Journal 153, 38 (2017)

    work page 2017

  43. [43]

    A. M. Meisner, D. Lang, and D. J. Schlegel, Deep full-sky coadds from three years of wise and neowise observations, The Astronomical Journal 154, 161 (2017)

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    E. F. Schlafly, A. M. Meisner, and G. M. Green, The un- wise catalog: Two billion infrared sources from five years of wise imaging, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 240, 30 (2019)

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    Krolewski, S

    A. Krolewski, S. Ferraro, E. F. Schlafly, and M. White, unWISE tomography of Planck CMB lensing, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (05), 047, arXiv:1909.07412v2

    work page arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    Bloch, S

    R. Bloch, S. C. Hotinli, J. Krywonos, and M. C. John- son, Cosmological constraints from ksz tomography, to appear

    work page

  47. [47]

    The Tau of Galaxy Clusters

    N. Battaglia, The Tau of Galaxy Clusters, JCAP 08, 058, arXiv:1607.02442 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    Akrami et al

    Y. Akrami et al. (Planck), Planck intermediate results. LVI. Detection of the CMB dipole through modulation of the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect: Eppur si muove II, Astron. Astrophys. 644, A100 (2020), arXiv:2003.12646 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    Akrami et al

    Y. Akrami et al. (Planck), Planck 2018 results. IV. Dif- fuse component separation, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A4 (2020), arXiv:1807.06208 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    H. K. Eriksen, J. B. Jewell, C. Dickinson, A. J. Banday, K. M. G´ orski, and C. R. Lawrence, Joint bayesian com- ponent separation and cmb power spectrum estimation, The Astrophysical Journal 676, 10 (2008)

    work page 2008

  51. [51]

    P. A. R. Ade et al. (Planck), Planck 2015 results. XII. Full Focal Plane simulations, Astron. Astrophys. 594, A12 (2016), arXiv:1509.06348 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  52. [52]

    D. Lenz, O. Dor´ e, and G. Lagache, Large-scale Maps of the Cosmic Infrared Background from Planck, The As- trophysical Journal 883, 75 (2019), arXiv:1905.00426

    work page arXiv 2019

  53. [53]

    Tegmark, A

    M. Tegmark, A. De Oliveira-Costa, and A. J. Hamil- ton, High resolution foreground cleaned CMB map from WMAP, Physical Review D 68, 123523 (2003)

    work page 2003

  54. [54]

    A WISE measurement of the ISW effect

    S. Ferraro, B. D. Sherwin, and D. N. Spergel, WISE mea- surement of the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect, Phys. Rev. D 91, 083533 (2015), arXiv:1401.1193 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  55. [55]

    G. A. Marques and A. Bernui, Tomographic analyses of the CMB lensing and galaxy clustering to probe the lin- ear structure growth, JCAP 05, 052, arXiv:1908.04854 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 1908

  56. [56]

    Krolewski, S

    A. Krolewski, S. Ferraro, and M. White, Cosmological constraints from unwise and planck cmb lensing tomog- raphy, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (12), 028

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    Krolewski and S

    A. Krolewski and S. Ferraro, The Integrated Sachs Wolfe effect: unWISE and Planck constraints on dynamical dark energy, JCAP04 (04), 033, arXiv:2110.13959 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv

  58. [58]

    Kusiak, B

    A. Kusiak, B. Bolliet, A. Krolewski, and J. C. Hill, Con- straining the galaxy-halo connection of infrared-selected unWISE galaxies with galaxy clustering and galaxy- CMB lensing power spectra, Phys. Rev. D 106, 123517 (2022), arXiv:2203.12583 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  59. [59]

    G. S. Farren, B. D. Sherwin, B. Bolliet, T. Namikawa, S. Ferraro, and A. Krolewski, Detection of the CMB lensing – galaxy bispectrum, (2023), arXiv:2311.04213 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  60. [60]

    G. S. Farren et al. (ACT), The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Cosmology from cross-correlations of un- WISE galaxies and ACT DR6 CMB lensing, (2023), arXiv:2309.05659 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    Z. Yan, A. S. Maniyar, and L. van Waerbeke, The star formation, dust, and abundance of galax- ies with unWISE-CIB cross-correlations, (2023), arXiv:2310.10848 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  62. [62]

    Gaia Collaboration, Gaia Data Release 2, Astronomy & Astrophysics 616, A1 (2018), arXiv:1804.09365

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  63. [63]

    Planck Collaboration, Planck 2018 results. IV. Diffuse component separation, Astronomy & Astrophysics 641, A4 (2020)

    work page 2018

  64. [64]

    M. S. Madhavacheril, N. Battaglia, K. M. Smith, and J. L. Sievers, Cosmology with the kinematic Sunyaev- Zeldovich effect: Breaking the optical depth degeneracy with fast radio bursts, Phys. Rev. D 100, 103532 (2019), arXiv:1901.02418 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2019

  65. [65]

    The COSMOS2015 Catalog: Exploring the 1<z<6 Universe with half a million galaxies

    C. Laigle et al. , The COSMOS2015 Catalog: Exploring the 1< z< 6 Universe with half a million galaxies, Astro- phys. J. Suppl. 224, 24 (2016), arXiv:1604.02350 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  66. [66]

    Takahashi, K

    R. Takahashi, K. Ioka, A. Mori, and K. Funahashi, Sta- tistical modelling of the cosmological dispersion measure, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 502, 2615 (2020), arXiv:2010.01560

    work page arXiv 2020

  67. [67]

    Calura, E

    F. Calura, E. Tescari, V. D’Odorico, M. Viel, S. Cristiani, T.-S. Kim, and J. S. Bolton, The lyman α forest flux probability distribution at z > 3, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 422, 3019 (2012)

    work page 2012

  68. [68]

    M. Viel, G. D. Becker, J. S. Bolton, and M. G. Haehnelt, Warm dark matter as a solution to the small scale crisis: New constraints from high redshift lyman-alpha forest data, Physical Review D88, 10.1103/physrevd.88.043502 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.043502 2013

  69. [69]

    Boera, M

    E. Boera, M. T. Murphy, G. D. Becker, and J. S. Bolton, Constraining the temperature–density relation of the in- tergalactic medium with the lyman α and β forests, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Let- ters 456, L79 (2015)

    work page 2015

  70. [70]

    P. R. Upton Sanderbeck, A. D’Aloisio, and M. J. Mc- Quinn, Models of the thermal evolution of the intergalac- tic medium after reionization, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 460, 1885 (2016)

    work page 2016

  71. [71]

    La Plante, H

    P. La Plante, H. Trac, R. Croft, and R. Cen, Helium reionization simulations. ii. signatures of quasar activity on the igm, The Astrophysical Journal 841, 87 (2017)

    work page 2017

  72. [72]

    La Plante, H

    P. La Plante, H. Trac, R. Croft, and R. Cen, Helium reionization simulations. iii. the helium ly α forest, The Astrophysical Journal 868, 106 (2018)

    work page 2018

  73. [73]

    J. S. Bolton, E. Puchwein, D. Sijacki, M. G. Haehnelt, T.-S. Kim, A. Meiksin, J. A. Regan, and M. Viel, The sherwood simulation suite: overview and data compar- isons with the lyman alpha forest at redshifts 2 ¡ z ¡ 5, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 464, 897 (2016)

    work page 2016

  74. [74]

    S. C. Hotinli, S. Ferraro, G. P. Holder, M. C. Johnson, M. Kamionkowski, and P. La Plante, Probing helium reionization with kinetic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich tomogra- phy, Phys. Rev. D 107, 103517 (2023), arXiv:2207.07660 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  75. [75]

    S. C. Hotinli, Cosmological probes of helium reioniza- tion, Phys. Rev. D 108, 043528 (2023), arXiv:2212.08004 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  76. [76]

    C ¸ alı¸ skan, N

    M. C ¸ alı¸ skan, N. Anil Kumar, S. C. Hotinli, and M. Kamionkowski, Reconstructing patchy helium reion- 26 ization using the cosmic microwave background and large-scale structure, (2023), arXiv:2312.00118 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  77. [77]

    A. L. Erickcek, S. M. Carroll, and M. Kamionkowski, Superhorizon Perturbations and the Cosmic Mi- crowave Background, Phys. Rev. D 78, 083012 (2008), arXiv:0808.1570 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  78. [78]

    Alizadeh and C

    E. Alizadeh and C. M. Hirata, How to detect gravita- tional waves through the cross correlation of the galaxy distribution with the cmb polarization, Physical Review D 85 (2012)

    work page 2012

  79. [79]

    C. L. Reichardt et al., A Measurement of Secondary Cos- mic Microwave Background Anisotropies with Two Years of South Pole Telescope Observations, Astrophys. J.755, 70 (2012), arXiv:1111.0932 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  80. [80]

    K. M. G´ orski, E. Hivon, A. J. Banday, B. D. Wan- delt, F. K. Hansen, M. Reinecke, and M. Bartelmann, HEALPix: A Framework for High-Resolution Discretiza- tion and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere, Astrophys. J. 622, 759 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0409513 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

Showing first 80 references.