Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Classification of Breast Cancer Histopathology Images using a Modified Supervised Contrastive Learning Method

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.03642 v2 pith:JHHR4RY3 submitted 2024-05-06 cs.CV cs.LG

Classification of Breast Cancer Histopathology Images using a Modified Supervised Contrastive Learning Method

classification cs.CV cs.LG
keywords contrastivemethodsupervisedimagelearningaccuracyapproachbreast
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep neural networks have reached remarkable achievements in medical image processing tasks, specifically in classifying and detecting various diseases. However, when confronted with limited data, these networks face a critical vulnerability, often succumbing to overfitting by excessively memorizing the limited information available. This work addresses the challenge mentioned above by improving the supervised contrastive learning method leveraging both image-level labels and domain-specific augmentations to enhance model robustness. This approach integrates self-supervised pre-training with a two-stage supervised contrastive learning strategy. In the first stage, we employ a modified supervised contrastive loss that not only focuses on reducing false negatives but also introduces an elimination effect to address false positives. In the second stage, a relaxing mechanism is introduced that refines positive and negative pairs based on similarity, ensuring that only relevant image representations are aligned. We evaluate our method on the BreakHis dataset, which consists of breast cancer histopathology images, and demonstrate an increase in classification accuracy by 1.45% in the image level, compared to the state-of-the-art method. This improvement corresponds to 93.63% absolute accuracy, highlighting the effectiveness of our approach in leveraging properties of data to learn more appropriate representation space.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.