REVIEW 3 cited by
Don't Forget to Connect! Improving RAG with Graph-based Reranking
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) has greatly improved the performance of Large Language Model (LLM) responses by grounding generation with context from existing documents. These systems work well when documents are clearly relevant to a question context. But what about when a document has partial information, or less obvious connections to the context? And how should we reason about connections between documents? In this work, we seek to answer these two core questions about RAG generation. We introduce G-RAG, a reranker based on graph neural networks (GNNs) between the retriever and reader in RAG. Our method combines both connections between documents and semantic information (via Abstract Meaning Representation graphs) to provide a context-informed ranker for RAG. G-RAG outperforms state-of-the-art approaches while having smaller computational footprint. Additionally, we assess the performance of PaLM 2 as a reranker and find it to significantly underperform G-RAG. This result emphasizes the importance of reranking for RAG even when using Large Language Models.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
A Deep Dive into Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Code Completion: Experience on WeChat
On WeChat's closed-source codebase, similarity-based RAG with combined BM25 and GTE-Qwen retrieval improves open-source LLM code completion more than identifier-based retrieval, with gains growing for larger models.
-
Causal Graphs Meet Thoughts: Enhancing Complex Reasoning in Graph-Augmented LLMs
A causal-first Graph-RAG pipeline that aligns retrieval with chain-of-thought shows up to about 10% precision gains on filtered medical QA subsets, but the evaluation omits error bars and test-set details.
-
A Comprehensive Survey on Integrating Large Language Models with Knowledge-Based Methods
A narrative review of LLM knowledge integration that categorizes techniques and compiles benchmarks, but lacks a systematic method and contains unreliable citations.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.