Pith. sign in

REVIEW 12 cited by

Mobile-Agent-v2: Mobile Device Operation Assistant with Effective Navigation via Multi-Agent Collaboration

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.01014 v1 pith:OWKBSHYR submitted 2024-06-03 cs.CL cs.CV

classification cs.CLcs.CV
keywords navigationoperationagentarchitecturedevicemobiletaskmobile-agent-v2
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Mobile device operation tasks are increasingly becoming a popular multi-modal AI application scenario. Current Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs), constrained by their training data, lack the capability to function effectively as operation assistants. Instead, MLLM-based agents, which enhance capabilities through tool invocation, are gradually being applied to this scenario. However, the two major navigation challenges in mobile device operation tasks, task progress navigation and focus content navigation, are significantly complicated under the single-agent architecture of existing work. This is due to the overly long token sequences and the interleaved text-image data format, which limit performance. To address these navigation challenges effectively, we propose Mobile-Agent-v2, a multi-agent architecture for mobile device operation assistance. The architecture comprises three agents: planning agent, decision agent, and reflection agent. The planning agent generates task progress, making the navigation of history operations more efficient. To retain focus content, we design a memory unit that updates with task progress. Additionally, to correct erroneous operations, the reflection agent observes the outcomes of each operation and handles any mistakes accordingly. Experimental results indicate that Mobile-Agent-v2 achieves over a 30% improvement in task completion compared to the single-agent architecture of Mobile-Agent. The code is open-sourced at https://github.com/X-PLUG/MobileAgent.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 12 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Topology-Aware Virtualization over Inter-Core Connected Neural Processing Units

    cs.AR 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    vNPU virtualizes inter-core connected NPUs via core-ID redirection, range-based memory translation, and topology mapping, achieving up to 1.92x speedup over MIG.

  2. Graph-Enhanced Policy Optimization in LLM Agent Training

    cs.AI 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GEPO adds graph-centrality-based intrinsic rewards, dynamic discounts, and two-level advantage shaping to group-based RL, improving LLM agent success on ALFWorld, WebShop, and a private Workbench benchmark.

  3. MobiAgent: A Systematic Framework for Customizable Mobile Agents

    cs.MA 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A full-stack mobile agent framework reports state-of-the-art task completion on its own DAG-based benchmark and 2-3x speedups from replaying recorded trajectories.

  4. StarDojo: Benchmarking Open-Ended Behaviors of Agentic Multimodal LLMs in Production-Living Simulations with Stardew Valley

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    StarDojo is a 1,000-task benchmark in Stardew Valley combining production and social activities, and the best tested MLLM (GPT-4.1) achieves only 12.7% success on its 100-task subset.

  5. MIND: A Multi-agent Framework for Zero-shot Harmful Meme Detection

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MIND uses unlabeled similar memes, bidirectional AI insight derivation, and multi-agent debate to improve zero-shot harmful meme detection on HarM, FHM, and MAMI.

  6. SafeMobile: Chain-level Jailbreak Detection and Automated Evaluation for Multimodal Mobile Agents

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A history-aware guard model with an LLM judge is reported to cut jailbreak success on mobile agent tasks from 86.1% to 8.4% while keeping task completion unchanged at 77.8%.

  7. Chain-of-Memory: Enhancing GUI Agents for Cross-Application Navigation

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Explicitly storing short-term and long-term text memories, instead of raw screenshots, improves GUI agent accuracy on cross-app tasks, and a new annotated dataset helps 7B models approach 72B-level memory use.

  8. Mirage-1: Augmenting and Updating GUI Agent with Hierarchical Multimodal Skills

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Mirage-1 combines a hierarchical multimodal skill memory with a skill-augmented Monte Carlo tree search to outperform prior GUI agents on Android and web online benchmarks.

  9. VLM-3D:End-to-End Vision-Language Models for Open-World 3D Perception

    cs.CV 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper promises VLM-3D but the body text is entirely the MVISU-Bench mobile-agent benchmark paper, so the stated result is unsupported.

  10. Uncertainty-Aware GUI Agent: Adaptive Perception through Component Recommendation and Human-in-the-Loop Refinement

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A GUI agent that trims UI input with a recommendation module and asks users when decisions are ambiguous reports state-of-the-art success rates, though the interaction module is not benchmarked.

  11. GUI-G$^2$: Gaussian Reward Modeling for GUI Grounding

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Modeling GUI elements as Gaussian distributions instead of binary targets yields 92.0% (ScreenSpot), 93.3% (ScreenSpot-v2), and 47.5% (ScreenSpot-Pro) for a 7B model, outperforming UI-TARS-72B by a relative 24.7% on t...

  12. Deep Research Agents: A Systematic Examination And Roadmap

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes LLM-powered deep research agents into static versus dynamic workflows and single versus multi agent architectures, and reviews their benchmarks and open challenges.

Pith tools