Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

II-Bench: An Image Implication Understanding Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.05862 v3 pith:BKRY4FKS submitted 2024-06-09 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CV
keywords mllmsii-benchimageaccuracymodelsunderstandingbenchmarkbenchmarks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapid advancements in the development of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have consistently led to new breakthroughs on various benchmarks. In response, numerous challenging and comprehensive benchmarks have been proposed to more accurately assess the capabilities of MLLMs. However, there is a dearth of exploration of the higher-order perceptual capabilities of MLLMs. To fill this gap, we propose the Image Implication understanding Benchmark, II-Bench, which aims to evaluate the model's higher-order perception of images. Through extensive experiments on II-Bench across multiple MLLMs, we have made significant findings. Initially, a substantial gap is observed between the performance of MLLMs and humans on II-Bench. The pinnacle accuracy of MLLMs attains 74.8%, whereas human accuracy averages 90%, peaking at an impressive 98%. Subsequently, MLLMs perform worse on abstract and complex images, suggesting limitations in their ability to understand high-level semantics and capture image details. Finally, it is observed that most models exhibit enhanced accuracy when image sentiment polarity hints are incorporated into the prompts. This observation underscores a notable deficiency in their inherent understanding of image sentiment. We believe that II-Bench will inspire the community to develop the next generation of MLLMs, advancing the journey towards expert artificial general intelligence (AGI). II-Bench is publicly available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/m-a-p/II-Bench.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. COHERENCE: Benchmarking Fine-Grained Image-Text Alignment in Interleaved Multimodal Contexts

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    COHERENCE is a benchmark for MLLMs' fine-grained image-text alignment in interleaved multimodal contexts across four domains, with 6161 questions and six-type error analysis.

  2. COHERENCE: Benchmarking Fine-Grained Image-Text Alignment in Interleaved Multimodal Contexts

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    COHERENCE is a new benchmark for measuring MLLMs' ability to recover fine-grained image-text correspondences in interleaved multimodal contexts.

  3. We-Math: Does Your Large Multimodal Model Achieve Human-like Mathematical Reasoning?

    cs.AI 2024-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    WE-MATH benchmark reveals most LMMs rely on rote memorization for visual math while GPT-4o has shifted toward knowledge generalization.

Pith tools