REVIEW 3 cited by
MC-MKE: A Fine-Grained Multimodal Knowledge Editing Benchmark Emphasizing Modality Consistency
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
MC-MKE: A Fine-Grained Multimodal Knowledge Editing Benchmark Emphasizing Modality Consistency
read the original abstract
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are prone to non-factual or outdated knowledge issues, which can manifest as misreading and misrecognition errors due to the complexity of multimodal knowledge. Previous benchmarks have not systematically analyzed the performance of editing methods in correcting these two error types. To better represent and correct these errors, we decompose multimodal knowledge into its visual and textual components. Different error types correspond to different editing formats, which edit distinct parts of the multimodal knowledge. We present MC-MKE, a fine-grained Multimodal Knowledge Editing benchmark emphasizing Modality Consistency. Our benchmark facilitates independent correction of misreading and misrecognition errors by editing the corresponding knowledge component. We evaluate four multimodal knowledge editing methods on MC-MKE, revealing their limitations, particularly in terms of modality consistency. Our work highlights the challenges posed by multimodal knowledge editing and motivates further research in developing effective techniques for this task.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Beyond Binary Edits Robust Multimodal Knowledge Editing with Adversarial Subspace Alignment
Introduces Latent Adversarial Robustification and Rank-Constrained Subspace Learning to enable robust generalization in multimodal knowledge editing through adversarial subspace alignment.
-
CrossCult-KIBench: A Benchmark for Cross-Cultural Knowledge Insertion in MLLMs
CrossCult-KIBench provides 9,800 test cases for cross-cultural knowledge insertion in MLLMs and shows that existing methods cannot reliably adapt to one culture while preserving behavior in others.
-
CrossCult-KIBench: A Benchmark for Cross-Cultural Knowledge Insertion in MLLMs
CrossCult-KIBench is a new benchmark for evaluating cross-cultural knowledge insertion in MLLMs, paired with the MCKI baseline method, showing current approaches fail to balance adaptation and preservation.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.