A Survey of Mamba
Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 22:06 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Mamba matches Transformers with near-linear sequence scaling
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
Mamba, drawing inspiration from classical state space models, has emerged as a promising alternative for building foundation models, delivering comparable modeling abilities to Transformers while preserving near-linear scalability concerning sequence length, as shown by the increasing number of studies achieving impressive performance across diverse domains.
What carries the argument
The selective state space model mechanism in Mamba that enables efficient sequence processing with linear complexity in length.
If this is right
- Mamba models can achieve better efficiency in inference for long sequences compared to Transformers.
- Adaptation techniques allow Mamba to excel in non-text data such as images and audio.
- Applications in multiple domains demonstrate Mamba's versatility beyond language modeling.
- The identified limitations suggest specific areas for architectural improvements in future Mamba variants.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Exploring combinations of Mamba with other architectures could yield hybrid models with enhanced capabilities.
- The survey's overview may inspire theoretical analyses of why state space models perform well in practice.
- Future surveys could track Mamba's progress beyond August 2024 to update the understanding of its potential.
- Developers might prioritize Mamba for resource-constrained environments handling long contexts.
Load-bearing premise
The body of Mamba-related papers published by August 2024 is already large and representative enough for a systematic consolidation to provide a comprehensive understanding of the architecture's potential.
What would settle it
Demonstration through large-scale experiments that Mamba fails to match Transformer performance on standard benchmarks or exhibits worse scaling properties would undermine the survey's central narrative.
Figures
read the original abstract
As one of the most representative DL techniques, Transformer architecture has empowered numerous advanced models, especially the large language models (LLMs) that comprise billions of parameters, becoming a cornerstone in deep learning. Despite the impressive achievements, Transformers still face inherent limitations, particularly the time-consuming inference resulting from the quadratic computation complexity of attention calculation. Recently, a novel architecture named Mamba, drawing inspiration from classical state space models (SSMs), has emerged as a promising alternative for building foundation models, delivering comparable modeling abilities to Transformers while preserving near-linear scalability concerning sequence length. This has sparked an increasing number of studies actively exploring Mamba's potential to achieve impressive performance across diverse domains. Given such rapid evolution, there is a critical need for a systematic review that consolidates existing Mamba-empowered models, offering a comprehensive understanding of this emerging model architecture. In this survey, we therefore conduct an in-depth investigation of recent Mamba-associated studies, covering three main aspects: the advancements of Mamba-based models, the techniques of adapting Mamba to diverse data, and the applications where Mamba can excel. Specifically, we first review the foundational knowledge of various representative deep learning models and the details of Mamba-1&2 as preliminaries. Then, to showcase the significance of Mamba for AI, we comprehensively review the related studies focusing on Mamba models' architecture design, data adaptability, and applications. Finally, we present a discussion of current limitations and explore various promising research directions to provide deeper insights for future investigations.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript is a literature survey on the Mamba architecture (inspired by state-space models) as an alternative to Transformers. It first reviews preliminaries on representative deep learning models and the details of Mamba-1 and Mamba-2, then surveys Mamba-based model architectures, techniques for adapting Mamba to diverse data modalities, and applications across domains, before discussing current limitations and promising research directions.
Significance. If the coverage is representative, the survey provides a timely consolidation of the rapidly growing Mamba literature (post-2023), which could help researchers identify patterns in architecture variants, data adaptations, and application successes. The explicit three-part structure (preliminaries, models/data/applications, limitations) and grounding in prior empirical claims about near-linear scaling are strengths for a survey in this fast-moving area.
major comments (2)
- [Abstract, §1] Abstract and §1: the claim that the survey conducts a 'systematic review' and 'in-depth investigation' is not supported by any description of search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or database sources; without these the representativeness of the consolidated studies cannot be assessed.
- [§3 (architecture/data/applications review)] The weakest assumption noted in the reader report (that the August 2024 corpus is already large and representative) is not addressed; the survey should include a quantitative summary (e.g., number of papers per category, publication timeline) to substantiate that the body of work merits consolidation.
minor comments (2)
- [Preliminaries section] Notation for Mamba-1 vs. Mamba-2 parameters and selective SSM equations should be introduced once in the preliminaries and used consistently thereafter to avoid reader confusion when comparing variants.
- [Tables/figures in §3] Figure captions and table headers listing surveyed models should include publication year and venue for quick reference; several entries currently omit these.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and positive recommendation for minor revision. We address the two major comments below and will update the manuscript accordingly to improve transparency and substantiation of the survey's scope.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract, §1] Abstract and §1: the claim that the survey conducts a 'systematic review' and 'in-depth investigation' is not supported by any description of search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or database sources; without these the representativeness of the consolidated studies cannot be assessed.
Authors: We agree that the abstract and §1 would be strengthened by greater methodological transparency. The survey was compiled via ongoing literature tracking on arXiv and related venues up to the August 2024 cutoff, but no formal search protocol was described. In revision we will add a short 'Literature Search Methodology' paragraph (or subsection) in §1 that states the primary sources (arXiv, Google Scholar), core keywords (Mamba, state-space model, selective SSM, etc.), and high-level inclusion criteria (peer-reviewed or preprint works proposing Mamba variants or applications). If space constraints arise we will also soften the phrasing from 'systematic review' to 'comprehensive survey' while retaining the claim of in-depth coverage. revision: yes
-
Referee: [§3 (architecture/data/applications review)] The weakest assumption noted in the reader report (that the August 2024 corpus is already large and representative) is not addressed; the survey should include a quantitative summary (e.g., number of papers per category, publication timeline) to substantiate that the body of work merits consolidation.
Authors: We concur that a quantitative overview would better justify the decision to consolidate the literature. The current text notes rapid growth qualitatively but provides no counts or timeline. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new table (or figure) early in §3 that reports: (i) total papers reviewed, (ii) breakdown by the three main categories (architecture variants, modality adaptations, domain applications), and (iii) a simple publication-year histogram or cumulative count showing the post-2023 surge. This addition will directly address the representativeness concern while remaining concise. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: literature survey with no derivations
full rationale
This manuscript is a survey paper that consolidates existing literature on Mamba models without presenting any original derivations, predictions, fitted parameters, or modeling inferences. Its claims about Mamba's capabilities are explicitly attributed to prior publications as background rather than derived internally. No equations, self-citations, or ansatzes function as load-bearing steps that reduce to the paper's own inputs by construction. The structure is self-contained as a review, with no circularity patterns applicable.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
mKG-RAG: Leveraging Multimodal Knowledge Graphs in Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-intensive VQA
mKG-RAG constructs multimodal KGs via MLLM-driven extraction and vision-text matching then applies dual-stage query-aware retrieval to achieve new state-of-the-art results on knowledge-based VQA.
-
DeMa: Dual-Path Delay-Aware Mamba for Efficient Multivariate Time Series Analysis
DeMa is a dual-path delay-aware Mamba architecture that decomposes MTS into intra-series temporal and inter-series variate paths to achieve SOTA performance with linear complexity on forecasting, imputation, anomaly d...
-
Predicting one-year clinical instability and mortality in heart failure patients using sequence modeling
Sequence models on EHR data from a Swedish heart failure cohort achieve AUPRCs of 0.555 to 0.854 for one-year instability and mortality predictions and support four care pathways.
-
When control meets large language models: From words to dynamics
The paper proposes a bidirectional continuum between LLMs and control systems, covering LLM-assisted controller design, control-based LLM steering, and state-space modeling of LLMs.
-
Advancing Intelligent Sequence Modeling: Evolution, Trade-offs, and Applications of State- Space Architectures from S4 to Mamba
A survey tracing the evolution of state-space models like S4 and Mamba, their efficiency trade-offs, and applications in NLP, vision, and other domains.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Ossama Abdel-Hamid, Abdel-rahman Mohamed, Hui Jiang, Li Deng, Gerald Penn, and Dong Yu. 2014. Convolutional neural networks for speech recognition. IEEE/ACM Transactions on audio, speech, and language processing 22, 10 (2014), 1533–1545
work page 2014
-
[2]
Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. 2023. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774 (2023)
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
- [3]
- [4]
- [5]
-
[6]
Anurag Arnab, Mostafa Dehghani, Georg Heigold, Chen Sun, Mario Lučić, and Cordelia Schmid. 2021. Vivit: A video vision transformer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision . 6836–6846
work page 2021
-
[7]
Zhongxin Bai and Xiao-Lei Zhang. 2021. Speaker recognition based on deep learning: An overview. Neural Networks 140 (2021), 65–99
work page 2021
- [8]
- [9]
- [10]
- [11]
- [12]
-
[13]
Rishi Bommasani, Drew A Hudson, Ehsan Adeli, Russ Altman, Simran Arora, Sydney von Arx, Michael S Bernstein, Jeannette Bohg, Antoine Bosselut, Emma Brunskill, et al. 2021. On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258 (2021)
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021
- [14]
- [15]
- [16]
- [17]
- [18]
- [19]
-
[20]
Deli Chen, Yankai Lin, Wei Li, Peng Li, Jie Zhou, and Xu Sun. 2020. Measuring and relieving the over-smoothing problem for graph neural networks from the topological view. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , Vol. 34. 3438–3445. Manuscript submitted to ACM 32 Qu et al
work page 2020
- [21]
-
[22]
Jiawei Chen, Hongyu Lin, Xianpei Han, and Le Sun. 2024. Benchmarking large language models in retrieval-augmented generation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , Vol. 38. 17754–17762
work page 2024
- [23]
- [24]
-
[25]
Xiao Chen, Wenqi Fan, Jingfan Chen, Haochen Liu, Zitao Liu, Zhaoxiang Zhang, and Qing Li. 2023. Fairly adaptive negative sampling for recommendations. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 . 3723–3733
work page 2023
- [26]
- [27]
-
[28]
Tri Dao and Albert Gu. 2024. Transformers are SSMs: Generalized Models and Efficient Algorithms Through Structured State Space Duality. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML)
work page 2024
- [29]
- [30]
- [31]
- [32]
-
[33]
Xin Luna Dong, Seungwhan Moon, Yifan Ethan Xu, Kshitiz Malik, and Zhou Yu. 2023. Towards next-generation intelligent assistants leveraging llm techniques. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining . 5792–5793
work page 2023
-
[34]
Filip Karlo Došilović, Mario Brčić, and Nikica Hlupić. 2018. Explainable artificial intelligence: A survey. In2018 41st International convention on information and communication technology, electronics and microelectronics (MIPRO) . IEEE, 0210–0215
work page 2018
- [35]
-
[36]
Lili Fan, Junhao Wang, Yuanmeng Chang, Yuke Li, Yutong Wang, and Dongpu Cao. 2024. 4D mmWave radar for autonomous driving perception: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles (2024)
work page 2024
-
[37]
Wenqi Fan, Tyler Derr, Yao Ma, Jianping Wang, Jiliang Tang, and Qing Li. 2019. Deep Adversarial Social Recommendation. In28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-19) . International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, 1351–1357
work page 2019
-
[38]
Wenqi Fan, Qing Li, and Min Cheng. 2018. Deep modeling of social relations for recommendation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 32
work page 2018
-
[39]
Wenqi Fan, Xiaorui Liu, Wei Jin, Xiangyu Zhao, Jiliang Tang, and Qing Li. 2022. Graph Trend Filtering Networks for Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval . 112–121
work page 2022
-
[40]
Wenqi Fan, Yao Ma, Qing Li, Yuan He, Eric Zhao, Jiliang Tang, and Dawei Yin. 2019. Graph neural networks for social recommendation. InThe world wide web conference . 417–426
work page 2019
-
[41]
Wenqi Fan, Yao Ma, Qing Li, Jianping Wang, Guoyong Cai, Jiliang Tang, and Dawei Yin. 2020. A graph neural network framework for social recommendations. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 34, 5 (2020), 2033–2047
work page 2020
-
[42]
Wenqi Fan, Yao Ma, Dawei Yin, Jianping Wang, Jiliang Tang, and Qing Li. 2019. Deep social collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems . 305–313
work page 2019
- [43]
-
[44]
Wenqi Fan, Xiangyu Zhao, Qing Li, Tyler Derr, Yao Ma, Hui Liu, Jianping Wang, and Jiliang Tang. 2023. Adversarial Attacks for Black-Box Recommender Systems Via Copying Transferable Cross-Domain User Profiles. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2023)
work page 2023
-
[45]
William Fedus, Barret Zoph, and Noam Shazeer. 2022. Switch transformers: Scaling to trillion parameter models with simple and efficient sparsity. Journal of Machine Learning Research 23, 120 (2022), 1–39
work page 2022
- [46]
-
[47]
Daniel Y Fu, Elliot L Epstein, Eric Nguyen, Armin W Thomas, Michael Zhang, Tri Dao, Atri Rudra, and Christopher Ré. 2023. Simple hardware- efficient long convolutions for sequence modeling. In International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 10373–10391
work page 2023
-
[48]
Guanyiman Fu, Fengchao Xiong, Jianfeng Lu, and Jun Zhou. 2024. Ssumamba: Spatial-spectral selective state space model for hyperspectral image denoising. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (2024). Manuscript submitted to ACM A Survey of Mamba 33
work page 2024
- [49]
-
[50]
Peng Gao, Shijie Geng, Renrui Zhang, Teli Ma, Rongyao Fang, Yongfeng Zhang, Hongsheng Li, and Yu Qiao. 2024. Clip-adapter: Better vision- language models with feature adapters. International Journal of Computer Vision 132, 2 (2024), 581–595
work page 2024
- [51]
- [52]
-
[53]
Negar Golestani and Mahta Moghaddam. 2020. Human activity recognition using magnetic induction-based motion signals and deep recurrent neural networks. Nature communications 11, 1 (2020), 1551
work page 2020
- [54]
-
[55]
Alex Graves and Alex Graves. 2012. Long short-term memory. Supervised sequence labelling with recurrent neural networks (2012), 37–45
work page 2012
-
[56]
Albert Gu and Tri Dao. 2023. Mamba: Linear-time sequence modeling with selective state spaces. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00752 (2023)
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
-
[57]
Albert Gu, Tri Dao, Stefano Ermon, Atri Rudra, and Christopher Ré. 2020. Hippo: Recurrent memory with optimal polynomial projections.Advances in neural information processing systems 33 (2020), 1474–1487
work page 2020
-
[58]
Albert Gu, Karan Goel, Ankit Gupta, and Christopher Ré. 2022. On the parameterization and initialization of diagonal state space models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 (2022), 35971–35983
work page 2022
-
[59]
Albert Gu, Karan Goel, and Christopher Ré. 2021. Efficiently modeling long sequences with structured state spaces. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.00396 (2021)
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021
-
[60]
Albert Gu, Isys Johnson, Karan Goel, Khaled Saab, Tri Dao, Atri Rudra, and Christopher Ré. 2021. Combining recurrent, convolutional, and continuous-time models with linear state space layers. Advances in neural information processing systems 34 (2021), 572–585
work page 2021
-
[61]
Yanchen Guan, Haicheng Liao, Zhenning Li, Jia Hu, Runze Yuan, Yunjian Li, Guohui Zhang, and Chengzhong Xu. 2024. World models for autonomous driving: An initial survey. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles (2024)
work page 2024
- [62]
-
[63]
Yulan Guo, Hanyun Wang, Qingyong Hu, Hao Liu, Li Liu, and Mohammed Bennamoun. 2020. Deep learning for 3d point clouds: A survey. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 43, 12 (2020), 4338–4364
work page 2020
- [64]
-
[65]
Mark Harris, Shubhabrata Sengupta, and John D Owens. 2007. Parallel prefix sum (scan) with CUDA. GPU gems 3, 39 (2007), 851–876
work page 2007
- [66]
-
[67]
Haoyang He, Yuhu Bai, Jiangning Zhang, Qingdong He, Hongxu Chen, Zhenye Gan, Chengjie Wang, Xiangtai Li, Guanzhong Tian, and Lei Xie
-
[68]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.06564 (2024)
Mambaad: Exploring state space models for multi-class unsupervised anomaly detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.06564 (2024)
- [69]
- [70]
-
[71]
Michiel Hermans and Benjamin Schrauwen. 2013. Training and analysing deep recurrent neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems 26 (2013)
work page 2013
-
[72]
Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. 2020. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in neural information processing systems 33 (2020), 6840–6851
work page 2020
- [73]
-
[74]
Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. 2021. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685 (2021)
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021
-
[75]
Hao Hu and Guo-Jun Qi. 2017. State-frequency memory recurrent neural networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 1568–1577
work page 2017
-
[76]
Lijie Hu, Yixin Liu, Ninghao Liu, Mengdi Huai, Lichao Sun, and Di Wang. 2023. Seat: stable and explainable attention. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 37. 12907–12915
work page 2023
- [77]
- [78]
-
[79]
Kexin Huang, Cao Xiao, Lucas M Glass, Marinka Zitnik, and Jimeng Sun. 2020. SkipGNN: predicting molecular interactions with skip-graph networks. Scientific reports 10, 1 (2020), 21092. Manuscript submitted to ACM 34 Qu et al
work page 2020
-
[80]
Ling Huang, Anthony D Joseph, Blaine Nelson, Benjamin IP Rubinstein, and J Doug Tygar. 2011. Adversarial machine learning. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM workshop on Security and artificial intelligence . 43–58
work page 2011
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.