Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

LMEMs for post-hoc analysis of HPO Benchmarking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.02533 v1 pith:FE3YDDGY submitted 2024-08-05 cs.LG

LMEMs for post-hoc analysis of HPO Benchmarking

classification cs.LG
keywords analysisbenchmarkinglmemscurrentdataexperimentinsightslearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The importance of tuning hyperparameters in Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) is established through empirical research and applications, evident from the increase in new hyperparameter optimization (HPO) algorithms and benchmarks steadily added by the community. However, current benchmarking practices using averaged performance across many datasets may obscure key differences between HPO methods, especially for pairwise comparisons. In this work, we apply Linear Mixed-Effect Models-based (LMEMs) significance testing for post-hoc analysis of HPO benchmarking runs. LMEMs allow flexible and expressive modeling on the entire experiment data, including information such as benchmark meta-features, offering deeper insights than current analysis practices. We demonstrate this through a case study on the PriorBand paper's experiment data to find insights not reported in the original work.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Rank Intervals for Leaderboards: A Hierarchical Framework for Model Evaluation

    stat.ML 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A hierarchical framework generates statistically valid task-level rank confidence intervals via pairwise comparisons and leaderboard-level rank prediction intervals via conformal prediction.