Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Measuring Agreeableness Bias in Multimodal Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.09111 v2 pith:I2XU4C2Y submitted 2024-08-17 cs.AI cs.CLcs.CVcs.HC

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.CVcs.HC
keywords modelspre-markedimagesmodeloptionsagreeablenessbiasmultimodal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper examines a phenomenon in multimodal language models where pre-marked options in question images can significantly influence model responses. Our study employs a systematic methodology to investigate this effect: we present models with images of multiple-choice questions, which they initially answer correctly, then expose the same model to versions with pre-marked options. Our findings reveal a significant shift in the models' responses towards the pre-marked option, even when it contradicts their answers in the neutral settings. Comprehensive evaluations demonstrate that this agreeableness bias is a consistent and quantifiable behavior across various model architectures. These results show potential limitations in the reliability of these models when processing images with pre-marked options, raising important questions about their application in critical decision-making contexts where such visual cues might be present.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools