Pith. sign in

REVIEW

EndoDepth: A Benchmark for Assessing Robustness in Endoscopic Depth Prediction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.19930 v1 pith:II4IC6TF submitted 2024-09-30 cs.CV

EndoDepth: A Benchmark for Assessing Robustness in Endoscopic Depth Prediction

classification cs.CV
keywords depthendoscopicrobustnessbenchmarkendodepthdesignedendoscopyestimation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Accurate depth estimation in endoscopy is vital for successfully implementing computer vision pipelines for various medical procedures and CAD tools. In this paper, we present the EndoDepth benchmark, an evaluation framework designed to assess the robustness of monocular depth prediction models in endoscopic scenarios. Unlike traditional datasets, the EndoDepth benchmark incorporates common challenges encountered during endoscopic procedures. We present an evaluation approach that is consistent and specifically designed to evaluate the robustness performance of the model in endoscopic scenarios. Among these is a novel composite metric called the mean Depth Estimation Robustness Score (mDERS), which offers an in-depth evaluation of a model's accuracy against errors brought on by endoscopic image corruptions. Moreover, we present SCARED-C, a new dataset designed specifically to assess endoscopy robustness. Through extensive experimentation, we evaluate state-of-the-art depth prediction architectures on the EndoDepth benchmark, revealing their strengths and weaknesses in handling endoscopic challenging imaging artifacts. Our results demonstrate the importance of specialized techniques for accurate depth estimation in endoscopy and provide valuable insights for future research directions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.