pith. sign in

arxiv: 2410.04622 · v2 · submitted 2024-10-06 · 🧮 math-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech· math.MP· math.SG· physics.class-ph

Hamiltonian thermodynamics on symplectic manifolds

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 19:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math-ph cond-mat.stat-mechmath.MPmath.SGphysics.class-ph
keywords symplectic geometryHamiltonian dynamicsLagrangian submanifoldsthermodynamicsideal gasequilibrium statesport-Hamiltonian systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

Identifying equilibrium states as Lagrangian submanifolds allows thermodynamic processes to be described by symplectic Hamiltonian dynamics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a symplectic formulation of thermodynamics. Equilibrium state spaces are identified with Lagrangian submanifolds of a symplectic manifold. Thermodynamic transformations then follow from Hamiltonian dynamics, with equilibrium states lying in level sets of constant Hamiltonian. This is applied to the ideal gas, maps between gases, free expansion, and port-Hamiltonian models for expansion and heat transfer.

Core claim

Upon identifying the spaces of equilibrium states with Lagrangian submanifolds of a symplectic manifold, thermodynamic processes are described by symplectic Hamiltonian dynamics where the space of equilibrium states is contained in the level set on which the Hamiltonian assumes a constant value. Explicit examples are given for the ideal gas, and the approach is extended to maps between related systems and to irreversible processes such as free expansion, as well as a port-Hamiltonian framework for the ideal gas.

What carries the argument

Lagrangian submanifolds representing spaces of equilibrium states, enabling Hamiltonian description of thermodynamic processes on symplectic manifolds.

If this is right

  • Thermodynamic processes for systems like the ideal gas follow Hamiltonian dynamics on the symplectic manifold.
  • Constructing maps between non-interacting and interacting gases becomes possible within the Hamiltonian framework.
  • Free expansion involving irreversible entropy generation can be described using the extended symplectic Hamiltonian dynamics.
  • A port-Hamiltonian framework applies to problems like isothermal expansion against a piston and heat transfer via a thermal conductor.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This framework may unify different thermodynamic ensembles through geometric properties of the symplectic manifold.
  • Tools from symplectic geometry could be used to analyze stability or phase transitions in thermodynamic systems.
  • Similar approaches might apply to other physical systems involving equilibrium states and dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that spaces of equilibrium states can be identified with Lagrangian submanifolds of a symplectic manifold and that thermodynamic transformations can be described by symplectic Hamiltonian dynamics.

What would settle it

A thermodynamic process where the equilibrium states do not lie on a constant Hamiltonian level set or cannot be represented as a Hamiltonian flow would falsify the description.

read the original abstract

We describe a symplectic approach towards thermodynamics in which thermodynamic transformations are described by (symplectic) Hamiltonian dynamics. Upon identifying the spaces of equilibrium states with Lagrangian submanifolds of a symplectic manifold, we present a Hamiltonian description of thermodynamic processes where the space of equilibrium states of a system in a certain ensemble is contained in the level set on which the Hamiltonian assumes a constant value. In particular, we work out two explicit examples involving the ideal gas and then describe a Hamiltonian approach towards constructing maps between related thermodynamic systems, e.g., the ideal (non-interacting) gas and interacting gases. Finally, we extend the theory of symplectic Hamiltonian dynamics to describe (a) the free expansion of the ideal gas which involves irreversible generation of entropy, and (b) a symplectic port-Hamiltonian framework for the ideal gas which is exemplified through two problems, namely, the problem of isothermal expansion against a piston and that of heat transfer between a heat bath and the gas via a thermal conductor.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a symplectic approach to thermodynamics by identifying spaces of equilibrium states with Lagrangian submanifolds of a symplectic manifold. Thermodynamic processes are then described by Hamiltonian dynamics in which these equilibrium spaces lie on constant-Hamiltonian level sets. Concrete examples are worked out for the ideal gas, maps between non-interacting and interacting gases are constructed via the framework, and the construction is extended to irreversible free expansion as well as a port-Hamiltonian formulation illustrated by isothermal piston expansion and heat transfer through a thermal conductor.

Significance. If the identification of equilibrium states with Lagrangian submanifolds and the level-set preservation under Hamiltonian flow can be shown to accommodate irreversible entropy production without auxiliary dissipation, the work would supply a geometrically unified description of both reversible and irreversible thermodynamics that builds directly on standard symplectic tools. The explicit ideal-gas calculations and the port-Hamiltonian examples constitute concrete, checkable content that would strengthen the proposal if the central extension holds.

major comments (1)
  1. [section describing free expansion of the ideal gas] The extension of the symplectic Hamiltonian dynamics to free expansion of the ideal gas (irreversible entropy generation) asserts that the same constant-Hamiltonian level-set description continues to apply. Standard symplectic flows are incompressible and reversible; the manuscript must therefore supply an explicit verification, in the relevant section, that entropy production remains compatible with the level-set constraint and does not violate closedness of the symplectic form or the first law. Without that verification the claim that the framework covers both reversible and irreversible cases rests on an unverified extension.
minor comments (2)
  1. Ensure that all steps of the two ideal-gas examples are written out with explicit coordinate charts and verification that the submanifolds are indeed Lagrangian.
  2. Clarify the precise definition of the Hamiltonian function in the port-Hamiltonian examples so that the constant-value level-set condition can be checked directly against the first law.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful review and the recommendation for major revision. We address the major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [section describing free expansion of the ideal gas] The extension of the symplectic Hamiltonian dynamics to free expansion of the ideal gas (irreversible entropy generation) asserts that the same constant-Hamiltonian level-set description continues to apply. Standard symplectic flows are incompressible and reversible; the manuscript must therefore supply an explicit verification, in the relevant section, that entropy production remains compatible with the level-set constraint and does not violate closedness of the symplectic form or the first law. Without that verification the claim that the framework covers both reversible and irreversible cases rests on an unverified extension.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification would strengthen the manuscript. In our construction for the free expansion, the Hamiltonian is defined on the extended phase space such that the irreversible process corresponds to a Hamiltonian flow that keeps the equilibrium Lagrangian submanifold on a constant-Hamiltonian level set. The symplectic form is closed by definition and is not affected by the dynamics. Regarding the first law, the energy differential is preserved along the flow as the Hamiltonian generates the dynamics consistently with the thermodynamic relations. However, to address the concern directly, we will add an explicit calculation in the revised version showing that the entropy production term is compatible with the level-set preservation and does not lead to any inconsistency with the closedness or the first law. This verification will be provided in the section on free expansion. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard symplectic geometry applied to thermodynamics

full rationale

The paper constructs its framework by identifying equilibrium state spaces with Lagrangian submanifolds of a symplectic manifold and describing processes via Hamiltonian dynamics on level sets. This is an application of established symplectic geometry rather than a derivation that reduces to its own inputs. No self-definitional loops, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the abstract or described chain. Extensions to free expansion and port-Hamiltonian systems are presented as direct theoretical extensions without reducing to prior fitted results or ansatzes smuggled via citation. The central claims remain independent and self-contained against external symplectic geometry benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard axioms of symplectic geometry together with the domain assumption that thermodynamic equilibrium states correspond to Lagrangian submanifolds. No free parameters or invented entities are indicated in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Spaces of equilibrium states can be identified with Lagrangian submanifolds of a symplectic manifold
    This identification is stated as the foundation for the Hamiltonian description in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5703 in / 1121 out tokens · 28816 ms · 2026-05-23T19:58:51.837768+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hermann, Geometry, Physics, and Systems , M

    R. Hermann, Geometry, Physics, and Systems , M. Dekker (1973)

  2. [2]

    Mrugała, Rep

    R. Mrugała, Rep. Math. Phys. 14, 419 (1978)

  3. [3]

    M. A. Peterson, Am. J. Phys. 47, 488 (1979)

  4. [4]

    Vojta, Ann

    G. Vojta, Ann. Phys. (Berl.) 502, 251 (1990)

  5. [5]

    Mrugała, J

    R. Mrugała, J. D. Nulton, J. C. Schön, and P. Salamon, Phys . Rev. A 41, 3156 (1990)

  6. [6]

    Mrugała, Rep

    R. Mrugała, Rep. Math. Phys. 33, 149 (1993)

  7. [7]

    S. G. Rajeev, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 323, 2265 (2008)

  8. [8]

    Grmela, Entropy 16, 1652 (2014)

    M. Grmela, Entropy 16, 1652 (2014)

  9. [9]

    Bravetti and F

    A. Bravetti and F. Nettel, Phys. Rev. D 90, 044064 (2014)

  10. [10]

    Bravetti and C

    A. Bravetti and C. S. Lopez-Monsalvo, J. Phys. A: Math. T heor. 48, 125206 (2015)

  11. [11]

    Bravetti, C

    A. Bravetti, C. S. Lopez-Monsalvo, and F. Nettel, Ann. P hys. (N.Y.) 361, 377 (2015)

  12. [12]

    M. C. Baldiotti, R. Fresneda, and C. Molina, Ann. Phys. ( N.Y.) 373, 245 (2016)

  13. [13]

    Cvetič, G

    M. Cvetič, G. W. Gibbons, H. Lü, and C. N. Pope, Phys. Rev. D 98, 106015 (2018)

  14. [14]

    Alarcón, P

    D. Alarcón, P. Fernández de Córdoba, J. M. Isidro, and C. Orea, Entropy 20, 554 (2018)

  15. [15]

    Bravetti, Int

    A. Bravetti, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 16, 1940003 (2019)

  16. [16]

    Ghosh and C

    A. Ghosh and C. Bhamidipati, Phys. Rev. D 100, 126020 (2019). 14

  17. [17]

    A. A. Simoes, M. de León, M. L. Valcázar, and D. M. de Diego , Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 476, 20200244 (2020)

  18. [18]

    Ghosh, M

    A. Ghosh, M. Bandyopadhyay, and C. Bhamidipati, Physic a A 585, 126402 (2022)

  19. [19]

    Aragón-Muñoz and H

    L. Aragón-Muñoz and H. Quevedo, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mo d. Phys. 19, 2250178 (2022)

  20. [20]

    Ghosh, Pramana 97, 49 (2023)

    A. Ghosh, Pramana 97, 49 (2023)

  21. [21]

    V. I. Arnold, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics , Graduate Texts in Mathemat- ics, vol. 60 (2nd ed.), Springer-Verlag (1989)

  22. [22]

    D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Thermal Physics , Addison Wesley (2000). 15