Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

RecoveryChaining: Learning Local Recovery Policies for Robust Manipulation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.13979 v2 pith:7CCD3UDA submitted 2024-10-17 cs.RO cs.AI

RecoveryChaining: Learning Local Recovery Policies for Robust Manipulation

classification cs.RO cs.AI
keywords recoverycontrollersmanipulationmodel-basednominalpoliciespolicyrobot
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Model-based planners and controllers are commonly used to solve complex manipulation problems as they can efficiently optimize diverse objectives and generalize to long horizon tasks. However, they often fail during deployment due to noisy actuation, partial observability and imperfect models. To enable a robot to recover from such failures, we propose to use hierarchical reinforcement learning to learn a recovery policy. The recovery policy is triggered when a failure is detected based on sensory observations and seeks to take the robot to a state from which it can complete the task using the nominal model-based controllers. Our approach, called RecoveryChaining, uses a hybrid action space, where the model-based controllers are provided as additional \emph{nominal} options which allows the recovery policy to decide how to recover, when to switch to a nominal controller and which controller to switch to even with \emph{sparse rewards}. We evaluate our approach in three multi-step manipulation tasks with sparse rewards, where it learns significantly more robust recovery policies than those learned by baselines. We successfully transfer recovery policies learned in simulation to a physical robot to demonstrate the feasibility of sim-to-real transfer with our method.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Recover, Discover, Plan: Learning Skills and Concepts from Robot Failures

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ReSYNC learns recovery skills via RL then discovers and refines relational predicates to enable abstract planning that generalizes failure avoidance to unseen long-horizon tasks, outperforming baselines by over 50% in...

  2. Fail2Progress: Learning from Real-World Robot Failures with Stein Variational Inference

    cs.RO 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0

    Fail2Progress generates failure-targeted simulation data via Stein variational inference and fine-tunes skill effect models, improving long-horizon manipulation success rates and generalizing to unseen object counts a...